🐻⬇️🏀

Creighton Bluejays

Also known as: Creighton Bluejays
Program History

2019 Team Stats (9 games)

80.7
PPG
75.3
Opp
+4.3
Margin
48.3%
FG%
41.9%
3P%
65.2%
FT%
33.4
RPG
15.4
APG
11.9
TO
79.8
Pace

Model Outputs

2018-2019
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1478 (#47) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1528 (#20) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → +38.1 (#22) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.389 (#44) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -9.3 More → 0.285 (#50) NetEff -9.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +5.3 More → 0.649 (#46) AdjNet +5.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +5.5 More → 0.653 (#46) AdjNet +5.5

2019 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2018-11-19 vs Boise State Broncos W 94 - 82
2018-12-01 vs Gonzaga Bulldogs L 92 - 103
2018-12-08 @ Nebraska Cornhuskers L 75 - 94
2018-12-14 vs Green Bay Phoenix W 86 - 65
2018-12-27 vs Kansas City Roos W 89 - 53
2019-01-09 vs Marquette Golden Eagles L 104 - 106
2019-02-06 @ Villanova Wildcats L 59 - 66
2019-03-03 @ Marquette Golden Eagles W 66 - 60
2019-03-14 @ Xavier Musketeers L 61 - 63
2019-03-19 vs Loyola Chicago Ramblers W 70 - 61

2019 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
T. Alexander T. Alexander - 9 34.4 17.7 3.6 3.6 1.4 0.2 1.3 14.1 11.0 - - - 41.7 37.1 81.8 - 56.2 52.0
M. Ballock M. Ballock G 10 33.0 12.0 4.0 2.6 0.7 0.1 1.0 8.1 10.3 - - - 53.1 48.3 60.0 - 70.3 70.4
M. Krampelj M. Krampelj F 10 24.6 11.6 6.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.5 7.9 10.8 - - - 55.7 33.3 64.7 - 61.7 59.5
D. Mintz D. Mintz G 10 30.5 10.7 3.1 3.1 1.3 0.2 2.4 8.6 7.4 - - - 43.0 45.0 68.2 - 55.9 53.5
M. Zegarowski M. Zegarowski G 9 26.7 9.7 3.4 2.7 0.8 0.0 1.6 6.3 8.7 - - - 50.9 51.6 76.5 - 67.5 64.9
D. Jefferson D. Jefferson F 8 20.2 6.9 4.8 1.1 0.6 0.1 0.9 5.6 7.0 5 0.5 0.9 48.9 23.1 57.1 0.56 53.8 52.2
J. Epperson J. Epperson C 4 8.8 4.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 2.2 4.0 - - - 88.9 0 60.0 - 84.8 88.9
K. Joseph K. Joseph G 10 15.4 4.4 1.3 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.6 4.3 1.9 - - - 39.5 35.3 57.1 - 47.7 46.5
C. Bishop C. Bishop - 7 8.9 3.9 1.9 0.4 0.7 0.3 1.3 2.6 3.3 - - - 61.1 0.0 50.0 - 60.3 61.1
S. Froling S. Froling C 8 8.6 3.8 1.8 0.5 0.1 0.2 1.1 3.1 2.1 - - - 52.0 20.0 42.9 - 53.4 54.0
C. Cashaw C. Cashaw G 10 13.0 3.0 2.1 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.7 2.3 3.7 - - - 47.8 80.0 50.0 - 56.6 56.5
J. Scurry J. Scurry G 4 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -0.5 - - - 25.0 0.0 0 - 25.0 25.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG