Concordia Chicago
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 975 (#293) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 964 (#285) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -17.3 (#339) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.064 (#656) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.065 (#370) | NetEff -19.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.037 (#621) | AdjNet -28.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.032 (#619) | AdjNet -28.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.159 (#619) | AdjO 54.0 | AdjD 72.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | @ | Illinois Col. | L | 36 - 75 |
| 2024-11-12 | @ | Anderson (IN) | L | 49 - 85 |
| 2024-11-22 | vs | UChicago | L | 52 - 60 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Hartford | W | 56 - 51 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | St. Norbert | L | 43 - 69 |
| 2024-12-17 | @ | Concordia Wisconsin | L | 42 - 70 |
| 2024-12-20 | vs | Northwestern-St. Paul | L | 56 - 80 |
| 2024-12-21 | @ | Augustana (IL) | L | 44 - 78 |
| 2025-01-24 | vs | Concordia (NE) | L | 67 - 108 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khaliah Reid | - | 6 | 17.5 | 11.3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 5.5 | -113 | -5.7 | -5.6 | 46.9 | 34.8 | 77.8 | -0.83 | 59.7 | 55.1 |
| Sydney Nimsakont | - | 9 | 28.6 | 9.8 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 10.3 | 0.1 | -140 | -5.8 | -5.4 | 28.0 | 24.2 | 77.8 | -1.32 | 42.0 | 36.0 |
| Mikalah Ellis | - | 5 | 18.8 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 2.6 | -58 | -3.4 | -4.4 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 33.3 | -0.17 | 44.1 | 44.3 |
| Alisyn MacGregor | - | 8 | 29.1 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 5.8 | 7.6 | -125 | -6.9 | -8.6 | 32.6 | 8.3 | 75.0 | -0.91 | 40.5 | 33.7 |
| Aniya Hinton-henry | - | 1 | 21.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | -51 | -2.2 | -3.9 | 25.0 | 0 | 75.0 | -0.33 | 43.4 | 25.0 |
| Nazuri Whigham | - | 6 | 16.3 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 6.2 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 32.4 | 42.9 | 66.7 | -0.03 | 37.8 | 36.5 |
| Cydnei Mitchell | - | 6 | 22.7 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 7.8 | -0.8 | -46 | -4.6 | -7.9 | 21.3 | 12.5 | 87.5 | -0.59 | 27.7 | 22.3 |
| Courtney Schneider | - | 1 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | -1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.36 | 106.4 | 100.0 |
| Aniyah Hinton-Henry | - | 8 | 12.8 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 0.6 | -51 | -2.2 | -3.9 | 46.2 | 0 | 47.1 | -0.33 | 47.8 | 46.2 |
| Destiney Cox | - | 8 | 10.1 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 41.4 | 0.0 | 25.0 | - | 40.6 | 41.4 |
| Grace King | - | 9 | 14.2 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 2.9 | -86 | -3.9 | -3.9 | 21.4 | 25.0 | 66.7 | -0.07 | 34.7 | 25.0 |
| Abby Kulig | - | 9 | 13.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 2.1 | -93 | -3.3 | -6.7 | 37.9 | 0.0 | 25.0 | -1.08 | 37.4 | 37.9 |
| Courtneye Schneider | - | 9 | 11.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 2.2 | -36 | -1.7 | -4.5 | 35.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 | -0.24 | 43.1 | 40.0 |
| Emma Nickerson | - | 9 | 7.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 2.6 | -1.3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 21.7 | 23.1 | 0.0 | 0.29 | 27.2 | 28.3 |
| Kira Holliday | - | 6 | 15.8 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 2.0 | -24 | -2.4 | -4.1 | 18.2 | 33.3 | 100.0 | -0.06 | 29.5 | 22.7 |
| Linley Southern | - | 9 | 8.7 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.6 | -71 | -2.3 | -5.2 | 27.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.26 | 27.3 | 27.3 |
| Hannah Lopez | - | 8 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | -54 | -2.0 | -3.8 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.54 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Alina Paul | - | 9 | 2.9 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | -0.4 | -24 | -1.4 | -7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.19 | 6.3 | 0.0 |
| Romiya Charleston | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Adrianna De La Rosa | - | 8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -169 | -9.9 | -12.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG