Coast Guard
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1060 (#121) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1044 (#183) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +5.3 (#117) | HCA +2.4 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | @ | Gordon | W | 71 - 62 |
| 2023-11-10 | @ | Endicott | W | 92 - 57 |
| 2023-11-14 | vs | Rensselaer | W | 76 - 65 |
| 2023-11-17 | @ | Dean | W | 77 - 19 |
| 2023-11-18 | vs | Elms | W | 90 - 63 |
| 2023-11-20 | @ | Trinity (CT) | L | 38 - 53 |
| 2023-11-29 | vs | Albertus Magnus | L | 77 - 83 |
| 2023-12-02 | vs | Westfield St. | W | 90 - 57 |
| 2023-12-04 | vs | Merchant Marine | W | 78 - 56 |
| 2023-12-06 | @ | Connecticut Col. | W | 80 - 53 |
| 2023-12-31 | @ | Russell Sage | W | 72 - 42 |
| 2024-01-03 | @ | Mitchell | W | 84 - 52 |
| 2024-01-04 | vs | Colby-Sawyer | W | 72 - 45 |
| 2024-01-10 | @ | Wesleyan (CT) | L | 68 - 69 |
| 2024-01-13 | vs | Wheaton (MA) | W | 84 - 65 |
| 2024-01-17 | @ | Springfield | W | 51 - 48 |
| 2024-01-20 | vs | Emerson | W | 77 - 50 |
| 2024-01-24 | vs | Babson | L | 56 - 68 |
| 2024-01-27 | @ | Wellesley | W | 71 - 41 |
| 2024-01-31 | vs | Smith | L | 55 - 77 |
| 2024-02-03 | vs | MIT | L | 59 - 72 |
| 2024-02-07 | @ | Clark (MA) | W | 82 - 68 |
| 2024-02-10 | @ | WPI | W | 62 - 60 |
| 2024-02-14 | vs | Salve Regina | W | 93 - 72 |
| 2024-02-17 | @ | Mount Holyoke | W | 60 - 21 |
| 2024-02-21 | vs | Babson | L | 49 - 65 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kira Wood | - | 20 | 32.2 | 15.7 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 14.0 | 7.1 | - | - | - | 40.7 | 35.2 | 72.5 | -0.2 | 52.8 | 50.9 |
| Dorothy Stotts | - | 20 | 32.8 | 13.8 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 13.6 | 5.3 | -12 | -1.7 | -1.8 | 41.2 | 28.7 | 87.0 | -0.17 | 49.1 | 47.2 |
| Kelly Hagerty | - | 20 | 25.6 | 11.6 | 9.2 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 10.9 | 11.8 | - | - | - | 49.5 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 0.09 | 50.9 | 49.5 |
| Glory Blethen | - | 20 | 29.9 | 11.0 | 7.2 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 10.4 | 11.8 | - | - | - | 44.0 | 22.2 | 71.1 | -0.0 | 48.1 | 45.0 |
| Julia Mann | - | 20 | 26.4 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 4.9 | 11.2 | - | - | - | 43.9 | 38.5 | 66.7 | 0.03 | 55.1 | 51.5 |
| Taylor Lynch | - | 20 | 21.4 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 26 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 35.6 | 38.0 | 57.1 | 0.34 | 44.7 | 43.6 |
| Farrah Peterein | - | 19 | 14.2 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 57 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 31.6 | 30.0 | 50.0 | 0.71 | 38.0 | 36.8 |
| Mackenzie Hilden | - | 20 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 31 | 5.2 | 11.3 | 34.4 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.37 | 40.4 | 34.4 |
| Julia Barbalato | - | 18 | 5.6 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 16.7 | 75.0 | - | 39.1 | 35.0 |
| Natasha Lange | - | 20 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 41.7 | 0.0 | 0.55 | 50.3 | 52.8 |
| Phoebe DuBois | - | 20 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.55 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Finley Rauscher | - | 19 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG