Clemson Tigers

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Also known as: Clemson Tigers

Program History

2026 Team Stats (33 games)

67.7

PPG

59.1

Opp

+8.6

Margin

43.0%

FG%

34.3%

3P%

67.1%

FT%

36.7

RPG

13.0

APG

13.1

66.2

Est. poss./game

69.8

Adj PPG

52.2

Adj Opp PPG

#41

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	1266 (#57)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	1199 (#63)	-
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +106 elo More →	1068 (#101)	HCA +106 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More →	+18.9 (#42)	HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More →	+18.7 (#41)	HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.827 (#59)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +12.8 More →	0.827 (#59)	NetEff +12.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +26.8 More →	0.957 (#44)	AdjNet +26.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +27.5 More →	0.961 (#44)	AdjNet +27.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 69.8 \| AdjD 52.2 More →	0.832 (#41)	AdjO 69.8 \| AdjD 52.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.2 \| AdjD 55.3 More →	0.711 (#47)	AdjO 65.2 \| AdjD 55.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.850 (#46)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.832 (#46)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 117 \| GP 33 More →	1176 (#71)	RD 117 \| GP 33

2026 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2025-11-03	vs	South Carolina Upstate Spartans	W	76 - 38
2025-11-06	@	Mercer Bears	W	72 - 51
2025-11-11	@	South Carolina Gamecocks	L	37 - 65
2025-11-13	vs	American University Eagles	W	78 - 38
2025-11-16	vs	Louisville Cardinals	L	54 - 65
2025-11-23	@	Furman Paladins	W	76 - 58
2025-11-25	vs	UL Monroe Warhawks	-	Preview
2025-11-28	vs	Western Carolina Catamounts	W	77 - 44
2025-11-30	vs	Michigan State Spartans	L	64 - 72
2025-12-04	@	Alabama Crimson Tide	L	48 - 72
2025-12-07	vs	App State Mountaineers	W	78 - 59
2025-12-14	vs	Pittsburgh Panthers	W	73 - 41
2025-12-17	@	Charleston Southern Buccaneers	W	78 - 52
2025-12-21	vs	North Florida Ospreys	W	84 - 62
2025-12-28	@	Chicago State Cougars	W	97 - 44
2026-01-01	@	Virginia Cavaliers	L	63 - 73
2026-01-04	@	Miami Hurricanes	W	70 - 55
2026-01-08	vs	NC State Wolfpack	W	75 - 65
2026-01-11	@	Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets	L	55 - 58
2026-01-18	vs	Wake Forest Demon Deacons	W	78 - 71
2026-01-22	@	Virginia Tech Hokies	L	68 - 71
2026-01-25	@	Notre Dame Fighting Irish	W	65 - 58
2026-01-29	vs	SMU Mustangs	W	83 - 54
2026-02-01	vs	Florida State Seminoles	W	77 - 58
2026-02-05	@	North Carolina Tar Heels	L	44 - 53
2026-02-08	vs	Boston College Eagles	W	83 - 59
2026-02-12	vs	Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets	W	67 - 65
2026-02-15	@	Syracuse Orange	L	64 - 68
2026-02-22	vs	Duke Blue Devils	W	53 - 51
2026-02-26	@	California Golden Bears	W	70 - 63
2026-03-01	@	Stanford Cardinal	L	50 - 85
2026-03-05	@	Virginia Cavaliers	W	63 - 50
2026-03-06	@	Duke Blue Devils	L	46 - 60
2026-03-21	vs	USC Trojans	L	67 - 71

2026 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Mia Moore	G	32	32.1	13.3	5.4	4.7	1.3	0.3	2.9	10.4	11.6	247	26	9.5	12.7	45.8	37.0	66.9	5.6	54.6	50.9
Rusne Augustinaite	G	33	24.5	10.6	2.8	0.8	0.3	0.1	1.1	9.1	4.4	124	27	4.6	7.9	41.5	42.1	82.6	-0.79	56.1	54.8
Taylor Johnson-Matthews	G	33	21.3	9.5	2.5	0.6	0.9	0.1	1.1	8.5	4.0	209	27	7.7	15.5	40.8	39.0	77.6	6.89	51.1	47.7
Rachael Rose	G	32	27.6	8.6	2.5	2.4	1.0	0.1	1.1	6.5	6.9	219	26	8.4	12.9	45.0	32.5	74.1	3.71	56.2	51.4
Demeara Hinds	F	31	20.7	8.2	6.3	0.9	0.9	0.3	2.5	5.8	8.3	144	25	5.8	11.8	58.9	0	46.7	0.95	57.8	58.9
Raven Thompson	F	33	26.2	7.5	4.5	1.5	0.8	0.1	1.4	6.2	6.7	157	27	5.8	9.3	47.3	31.5	87.5	0.02	55.3	51.5
Hannah Kohn	G	33	18.8	4.7	1.6	0.7	0.6	0.1	0.7	4.8	2.1	47	27	1.7	3.8	30.6	30.1	66.7	-1.41	45.8	44.1
Hadley Periman	G	32	22.4	2.6	5.5	1.2	0.7	1.0	1.1	3.1	6.8	138	26	5.3	10.1	26.3	18.2	66.7	1.44	37.4	32.3
Holland Harris	G	22	8.5	2.1	2.2	0.3	0.2	0.3	0.5	2.2	2.4	3	18	0.2	0.7	37.5	37.5	38.5	-4.98	43.7	43.8
Morgan Lee	C	21	6.1	2.0	1.1	0.1	0.1	0.6	0.2	2.0	1.7	13	16	0.8	4.8	39.0	17.6	100.0	-2.18	47.0	42.7
Amaia Jackson	G	13	6.3	1.8	0.5	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.2	1.8	0.8	-2	12	-0.2	-1.1	34.8	18.2	62.5	-2.04	43.4	39.1
Morgan Miller	F	11	3.2	1.6	0.8	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.1	0.8	1.7	-4	10	-0.4	-5.3	66.7	75.0	37.5	-2.84	71.9	83.3
Ja'Kerra Butler	G	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2025-2026 Shot Zones

1878 located field-goal attempts in 33 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Mia MooreRusne AugustinaiteTaylor Johnson-MatthewsDemeara HindsHannah Kohn

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	149-253	58.9	298	Demeara Hinds 26% (76 pts)	Mia Moore 21% (62 pts)	Mia Moore 30% (31 misses)	Demeara Hinds 22% (23 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	319-639	49.9	638	Mia Moore 26% (166 pts)	Demeara Hinds 21% (132 pts)	Mia Moore 25% (81 misses)	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 19% (62 misses)
Mid-range left	27-75	36.0	54	Rusne Augustinaite 48% (26 pts)	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 33% (18 pts)	Rusne Augustinaite 42% (20 misses)	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 17% (8 misses)
Mid-range center	16-44	36.4	32	Rusne Augustinaite 56% (18 pts)	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 25% (8 pts)	Rusne Augustinaite 36% (10 misses)	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 29% (8 misses)
Mid-range right	32-97	33.0	64	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 28% (18 pts)	Rusne Augustinaite 25% (16 pts)	Rusne Augustinaite 37% (24 misses)	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 29% (19 misses)
Left corner 3	29-60	48.3	87	Rusne Augustinaite 31% (27 pts)	Hadley Periman 14% (12 pts)	Rusne Augustinaite 32% (10 misses)	Rachael Rose 19% (6 misses)
Right corner 3	19-44	43.2	57	Hannah Kohn 32% (18 pts)	Rusne Augustinaite 32% (18 pts)	Hannah Kohn 24% (6 misses)	Mia Moore 24% (6 misses)
Above-break 3 left	100-292	34.2	300	Rusne Augustinaite 30% (90 pts)	Mia Moore 15% (45 pts)	Hannah Kohn 21% (40 misses)	Rusne Augustinaite 19% (36 misses)
Above-break 3 center	49-163	30.1	147	Rusne Augustinaite 31% (45 pts)	Hannah Kohn 16% (24 pts)	Hannah Kohn 19% (22 misses)	Rusne Augustinaite 17% (19 misses)
Above-break 3 right	67-211	31.8	201	Rusne Augustinaite 30% (60 pts)	Taylor Johnson-Matthews 25% (51 pts)	Rusne Augustinaite 26% (37 misses)	Hannah Kohn 19% (28 misses)