Clemson Tigers
2024 Team Stats (8 games)
61.0
PPG
81.2
Opp
-20.2
Margin
38.1%
FG%
25.0%
3P%
72.3%
FT%
32.0
RPG
11.4
APG
16.8
TO
82.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1123 (#85) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1185 (#88) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +35.4 (#48) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.643 (#136) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.767 (#33) | AdjNet +10.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.777 (#33) | AdjNet +10.7 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | @ | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 40 - 109 |
| 2023-11-24 | vs | Mississippi State Bulldogs | L | 78 - 81 |
| 2023-12-31 | @ | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 76 - 82 |
| 2024-01-07 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 72 - 78 |
| 2024-01-18 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | L | 64 - 81 |
| 2024-01-21 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 62 - 74 |
| 2024-01-25 | vs | NC State Wolfpack | L | 49 - 71 |
| 2024-02-22 | @ | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 47 - 74 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Harris
|
G | 8 | 25.0 | 14.9 | 2.9 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 11.9 | 9.1 | -39 | -6.5 | -6.0 | 46.3 | 26.7 | 69.2 | -0.42 | 53.0 | 48.4 |
A. Robinson
|
F | 8 | 32.6 | 13.5 | 6.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 6.4 | 16 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 42.7 | 25.0 | 76.9 | 0.32 | 50.3 | 45.8 |
R. Whitehorn
|
G | 8 | 30.6 | 12.9 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 11.4 | 6.6 | -41 | -6.8 | -6.1 | 40.7 | 32.3 | 79.2 | -0.42 | 50.7 | 46.2 |
M. Cluse
|
G | 2 | 18.5 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 25.0 | 40.0 | - | 52.5 | 53.6 |
M. Elmore
|
F | 8 | 26.8 | 4.9 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 6.5 | -15 | -2.5 | -3.7 | 36.1 | 34.8 | 62.5 | -0.06 | 49.3 | 47.2 |
M. Kramer
|
G | 7 | 25.4 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 6.3 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 22.7 | 16.7 | 100.0 | - | 34.3 | 29.5 |
N. Valentine
|
G | 8 | 9.9 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 0.1 | -22 | -3.7 | -8.1 | 33.3 | 36.4 | 0 | -0.5 | 48.1 | 48.1 |
E. Inyang
|
C | 8 | 13.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 7 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 45.8 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.01 | 48.2 | 45.8 |
D. Rauch
|
G | 6 | 16.2 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 0.2 | -2 | -0.4 | -0.7 | 20.0 | 23.1 | 0 | -0.06 | 30.0 | 30.0 |
A. Freeman
|
F | 6 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.7 | -9 | -1.3 | -1.2 | 44.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.13 | 40.5 | 44.4 |
M. Ott
|
G | 8 | 15.0 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 2.8 | -1.1 | -25 | -4.2 | -6.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 0 | -0.38 | 6.8 | 6.8 |
K. Kellermann
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
B. Ranallo
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.1 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG