Clemson Tigers
2023 Team Stats (9 games)
57.1
PPG
68.0
Opp
-10.9
Margin
38.4%
FG%
26.6%
3P%
61.4%
FT%
34.1
RPG
10.7
APG
18.4
TO
81.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1178 (#73) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1209 (#76) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.5 (#60) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.494 (#186) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-17 | vs | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 31 - 85 |
| 2022-11-24 | vs | Kansas State Wildcats | L | 38 - 76 |
| 2022-11-26 | @ | Northern Arizona Lumberjacks | W | 80 - 62 |
| 2022-12-18 | @ | NC State Wolfpack | L | 59 - 77 |
| 2022-12-29 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | W | 64 - 59 |
| 2023-01-12 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 56 - 66 |
| 2023-01-19 | vs | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 54 - 57 |
| 2023-01-29 | vs | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 58 - 69 |
| 2023-02-26 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | W | 74 - 61 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Robinson
|
F | 9 | 29.8 | 12.1 | 5.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 10.7 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 45.8 | 29.2 | 77.8 | - | 52.4 | 49.5 |
R. Whitehorn
|
G | 9 | 28.2 | 11.1 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 10.9 | 7.2 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 23.5 | 48.0 | - | 45.9 | 44.9 |
D. Bradford
|
G | 9 | 28.7 | 8.2 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 9.2 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 28.9 | 19.4 | 86.4 | - | 39.9 | 33.1 |
B. Perpignan
|
PG | 9 | 26.3 | 7.6 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 3.9 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 38.1 | 57.1 | - | 51.3 | 49.1 |
H. Hank
|
F | 9 | 26.1 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 44.7 | 29.2 | 50.0 | - | 52.4 | 52.1 |
A. Douglas
|
G | 9 | 17.8 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 4.9 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 26.3 | 50.0 | - | 35.5 | 33.0 |
E. Inyang
|
C | 9 | 11.4 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 52.2 | 0 | 70.0 | - | 56.6 | 52.2 |
M. Elmore
|
F | 9 | 12.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 31.8 | 23.1 | 100.0 | - | 40.1 | 38.6 |
K. Gaines
|
G | 9 | 8.4 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 26.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | - | 30.9 | 28.9 |
M. Ott
|
G | 9 | 10.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 26.7 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
W. Hipp
|
G | 2 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
T. Brown
|
F | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG