Clemson
2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)
65.0
PPG
53.2
Opp
+11.8
Margin
40.3%
FG%
32.2%
3P%
69.2%
FT%
36.5
RPG
13.5
APG
13.8
TO
67.4
Est. poss./game
62.4
Adj PPG
53.9
Adj Opp PPG
#76
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2026-2027
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1194 (#79) | Preseason prior 1184 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1126, returning -60, transfers +118, freshmen +0 |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1114 (#84) | HCA +169 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1111 (#84) | HCA +169 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.5 (#45) | HCA +1.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +18.5 (#45) | HCA +1.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.854 (#76) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.854 (#46) | AdjNet +21.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.847 (#53) | AdjNet +19.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.700 (#76) | AdjO 62.4 | AdjD 53.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.698 (#74) | AdjO 62.3 | AdjD 53.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.773 (#61) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.773 (#61) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1149 (#76) | RD 165 | GP 4 |
| Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.776 (#70) | Chronological component blend with rest and venue. |
Rank through the season
League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.
Recency Ensemble
Log Adjusted
Elo
Points Off/Def Recency
2026-2027 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | vs | Radford Highlanders | W | 68 - 47 |
| 2026-11-05 | vs | East Tennessee State Buccaneers | W | 76 - 57 |
| 2026-11-08 | vs | UNC Greensboro Spartans | W | 72 - 44 |
| 2026-11-12 | vs | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 44 - 65 |
| 2026-11-15 | vs | Stetson Hatters | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-18 | vs | South Carolina Upstate Spartans | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-20 | vs | UNC Asheville Bulldogs | - | Preview |
2026-2027 Roster
Estimated Minutes by Position
Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mackenzie Nelson
|
G | 4 | 29.2 | 12.2 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 27 | 4 | 6.8 | 9.2 | 45.7 | 33.3 | 82.4 | 1.8 | 57.7 | 50.0 |
Mia Moore
|
G | 4 | 32.5 | 11.2 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 29 | 4 | 7.2 | 8.9 | 41.7 | 57.1 | 68.8 | 3.85 | 52.3 | 47.2 |
Taliyah Henderson
|
G | 4 | 26.8 | 9.0 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 54 | 4 | 13.5 | 20.1 | 37.5 | 28.6 | 80.0 | 3.66 | 49.5 | 43.8 |
Edie Clarke
|
F | 4 | 23.5 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 15 | 4 | 3.8 | 6.4 | 53.3 | 22.2 | 33.3 | 0.82 | 55.9 | 56.7 |
Julia Scott
|
F | 4 | 12.2 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 35 | 4 | 8.8 | 28.9 | 45.5 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 1.68 | 48.1 | 47.7 |
Jenna Lawrence
|
F | 4 | 7.8 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 10 | 4 | 2.5 | 12.3 | 42.9 | 38.5 | 100.0 | 0.77 | 63.8 | 60.7 |
Holland Harris
|
G | 3 | 15.0 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 15 | 3 | 5.0 | 13.2 | 30.8 | 37.5 | 50.0 | -0.89 | 44.0 | 42.3 |
Rusne Augustinaite
|
G | 4 | 24.2 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 20 | 4 | 5.0 | 8.3 | 16.0 | 21.1 | 100.0 | -1.33 | 28.5 | 24.0 |
Kimora Fields
|
F | 2 | 8.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 4.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.65 | 36.3 | 33.3 |
Meeyah Green
|
G | 4 | 10.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 19 | 4 | 4.8 | 18.4 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.69 | 66.7 | 66.7 |
Amaia Jackson
|
G | 4 | 9.2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 16 | 4 | 4.0 | 17.3 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 0.49 | 61.5 | 62.5 |
Yakiya Milton
|
F | 4 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 4.0 | -8 | 4 | -2.0 | -11.0 | 42.9 | 0 | 0.0 | -2.24 | 38.1 | 42.9 |
Ja'Kerra Butler
|
G | 1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.86 | 26.6 | 0.0 |
Morgan Miller
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2026-2027 Shot Zones
231 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Mackenzie NelsonEdie ClarkeMia MooreTaliyah HendersonJulia ScottJenna LawrenceRusne AugustinaiteHolland HarrisAmaia Jackson
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 20-31 | 64.5 | 40 | Edie Clarke 25% (10 pts) | Mackenzie Nelson 25% (10 pts) | Mackenzie Nelson 18% (2 misses) | Yakiya Milton 18% (2 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 41-86 | 47.7 | 82 | Edie Clarke 20% (16 pts) | Mackenzie Nelson 20% (16 pts) | Mia Moore 27% (12 misses) | Mackenzie Nelson 20% (9 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 3-13 | 23.1 | 6 | Edie Clarke 33% (2 pts) | Mia Moore 33% (2 pts) | Holland Harris 20% (2 misses) | Mackenzie Nelson 20% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 0-3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Edie Clarke 33% (1 misses) | Mia Moore 33% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 0-8 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Julia Scott 25% (2 misses) | Mia Moore 25% (2 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 3-8 | 37.5 | 9 | Edie Clarke 33% (3 pts) | Mia Moore 33% (3 pts) | Rusne Augustinaite 40% (2 misses) | Holland Harris 20% (1 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 2-6 | 33.3 | 6 | Jenna Lawrence 50% (3 pts) | Taliyah Henderson 50% (3 pts) | Taliyah Henderson 50% (2 misses) | Mia Moore 25% (1 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 9-34 | 26.5 | 27 | Jenna Lawrence 33% (9 pts) | Holland Harris 22% (6 pts) | Rusne Augustinaite 36% (9 misses) | Jenna Lawrence 20% (5 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 11-20 | 55.0 | 33 | Mackenzie Nelson 27% (9 pts) | Rusne Augustinaite 18% (6 pts) | Edie Clarke 56% (5 misses) | Mackenzie Nelson 22% (2 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 4-22 | 18.2 | 12 | Amaia Jackson 25% (3 pts) | Jenna Lawrence 25% (3 pts) | Taliyah Henderson 33% (6 misses) | Holland Harris 17% (3 misses) |