Cincinnati
Model Outputs
2003-2004
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1533 (#77) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1512 (#53) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.8 (#62) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.757 (#17) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.906 (#9) | AdjNet +19.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.908 (#9) | AdjNet +19.7 |
2004 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-11-22 | vs | Cincinnati | W | 88 - 66 |
| 2003-11-24 | vs | Oakland | W | 89 - 60 |
| 2003-11-29 | vs | Coppin State | L | 56 - 76 |
| 2003-12-17 | vs | Clemson | L | 56 - 79 |
| 2003-12-20 | vs | Middle Tennessee | L | 54 - 89 |
| 2003-12-23 | vs | Dayton | L | 53 - 82 |
| 2003-12-27 | vs | Miami (OH) | L | 63 - 83 |
| 2003-12-30 | vs | Elon | L | 63 - 102 |
| 2004-01-10 | vs | DePaul | L | 65 - 90 |
| 2004-01-17 | vs | TCU | L | 57 - 85 |
| 2004-01-28 | vs | East Carolina | L | 57 - 80 |
| 2004-01-31 | vs | Cincinnati | L | 83 - 86 |
| 2004-02-11 | vs | South Florida | L | 67 - 80 |
| 2004-02-21 | vs | Louisville | L | 61 - 66 |
| 2004-02-25 | vs | Saint Louis | L | 52 - 77 |
| 2004-02-28 | @ | - | L | 67 - 75 |
| 2004-03-06 | vs | Memphis | L | 79 - 83 |
| 2004-03-11 | vs | Louisville | L | 62 - 64 |
| 2004-03-12 | vs | Saint Louis | L | 46 - 66 |
| 2004-03-13 | vs | DePaul | L | 50 - 55 |
| 2004-03-19 | vs | East Tennessee State | W | 80 - 77 |
| 2004-03-21 | @ | - | L | 68 - 92 |
2004 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason Maxiell | F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tony Bobbitt | G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Field Williams | G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Eric Hicks | F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| James White | F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nick Williams | G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kareem Johnson | C | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Armein Kirkland | G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Robert Whaley | C | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Chadd Moore | G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jamaal Lucas | G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| John Meeker | G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG