Cincinnati Bearcats
2021 Team Stats (3 games)
56.3
PPG
65.0
Opp
-8.7
Margin
41.4%
FG%
25.0%
3P%
68.8%
FT%
28.3
RPG
12.3
APG
16.7
TO
74.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 997 (#212) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1013 (#234) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +26.2 (#99) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.225 (#277) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-28 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | - | Preview |
| 2020-12-22 | vs | South Florida Bulls | L | 61 - 73 |
| 2021-01-30 | @ | South Florida Bulls | - | Preview |
| 2021-02-17 | @ | South Florida Bulls | L | 65 - 69 |
| 2021-03-09 | @ | UCF Knights | L | 43 - 53 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Thomas
|
F | 3 | 41.7 | 22.7 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 16.3 | 17.3 | - | - | - | 53.1 | 28.6 | 73.7 | - | 59.3 | 55.1 |
C. Wilson
|
G | 3 | 25.7 | 10.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 26.7 | 20.0 | 90.9 | - | 44.5 | 35.0 |
J. Hayes
|
F | 3 | 32.0 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 40.8 | 36.4 |
A. Niang
|
F | 3 | 24.7 | 6.7 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 64.3 | 66.7 | 0 | - | 71.4 | 71.4 |
M. Schimmel
|
G | 3 | 34.0 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 6.3 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 36.8 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 39.5 | 39.5 |
D. Haymer
|
G | 1 | 22.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Jada Scott
|
F | 3 | 18.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
S. Gritzali
|
G | 2 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 25.8 | 0.0 |
Jadyn Scott
|
F | 3 | 17.7 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 14.5 | 16.7 |
R. Burton
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Khalifa
|
C | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG