Cincinnati Bearcats
2020 Team Stats (6 games)
64.5
PPG
69.8
Opp
-5.3
Margin
40.3%
FG%
31.9%
3P%
64.4%
FT%
36.0
RPG
14.3
APG
13.8
TO
82.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1033 (#192) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1117 (#149) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +28.8 (#94) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.568 (#189) | - |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | vs | Bucknell Bison | L | 48 - 56 |
| 2020-02-12 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 78 - 53 |
| 2020-02-18 | @ | Houston Cougars | W | 74 - 65 |
| 2020-02-26 | vs | UConn Huskies | L | 58 - 105 |
| 2020-03-02 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | W | 76 - 53 |
| 2020-03-09 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 53 - 87 |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Miller
|
G | 6 | 33.8 | 15.5 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 14.7 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 38.6 | 36.1 | 66.7 | 0.21 | 48.5 | 46.0 |
A. Rizor
|
F | 6 | 32.5 | 14.0 | 7.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 12.5 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 52.0 | 0 | 54.5 | 0.77 | 52.6 | 52.0 |
I. Thomas
|
F | 6 | 30.0 | 12.0 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 9.8 | 11.3 | - | - | - | 50.8 | 0.0 | 63.2 | 0.72 | 53.4 | 50.8 |
S. Rodgers
|
G | 6 | 34.7 | 8.7 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 8.8 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 30.2 | 40.0 | 88.9 | 1.53 | 45.6 | 41.5 |
A. Moore
|
G | 6 | 19.7 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 40.7 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 1.35 | 43.5 | 40.7 |
F. Sifa
|
G | 6 | 17.3 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.74 | 33.1 | 28.6 |
A. Nelson
|
G | 5 | 9.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 1.11 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Jadyn Scott
|
F | 5 | 6.4 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 122 | 8.7 | 49.2 | 44.4 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.78 | 45.5 | 44.4 |
Jada Scott
|
F | 4 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 122 | 8.7 | 49.2 | 66.7 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 0.49 | 77.3 | 83.3 |
S. Gritzali
|
G | 2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.16 | 113.6 | 0 |
C. Watson
|
G | 6 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 70 | 3.2 | 15.5 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.89 | 31.1 | 14.3 |
J. Tuff
|
G | 4 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.0 | -0.8 | -36 | -4.5 | -37.6 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 0 | -0.1 | 18.8 | 18.8 |
N. Khalifa
|
C | 6 | 6.2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 12.5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 1.06 | 16.9 | 12.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG