Cincinnati Bearcats
2014 Team Stats (7 games)
42.4
PPG
70.6
Opp
-28.2
Margin
32.4%
FG%
24.1%
3P%
60.8%
FT%
30.7
RPG
8.7
APG
21.4
TO
75.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2013-2014
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 868 (#549) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 939 (#363) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +19.2 (#158) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.396 (#249) | - |
2014 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-11-21 | vs | Iowa State Cyclones | L | 42 - 78 |
| 2013-12-29 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 34 - 67 |
| 2014-01-04 | @ | Louisville Cardinals | L | 45 - 64 |
| 2014-02-01 | vs | UConn Huskies | L | 29 - 86 |
| 2014-03-01 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | L | 51 - 75 |
| 2014-03-07 | vs | UCF Knights | W | 54 - 52 |
| 2014-03-08 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 42 - 72 |
2014 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Randolph
|
F | 7 | 34.3 | 11.0 | 9.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 10.3 | 8.9 | - | - | - | 48.6 | 0 | 63.6 | - | 50.1 | 48.6 |
A. Lovett
|
G | 7 | 32.9 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 4.6 | 11.3 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 24.1 | 15.2 | 72.2 | - | 32.2 | 27.2 |
R. Humphrey
|
- | 6 | 27.5 | 7.2 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 6.2 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 35.1 | 40.0 | 75.0 | - | 50.9 | 45.9 |
D. Hollins
|
NA | 3 | 15.0 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 0.0 | 62.5 | - | 36.1 | 30.0 |
A. Durley
|
G | 2 | 22.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 42.1 | 36.4 |
K. Cook
|
G | 7 | 32.3 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 5.7 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 27.5 | 30.0 | 25.0 | - | 38.3 | 38.8 |
B. Quisenberry
|
G | 4 | 28.2 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 21.7 | 9.1 | 33.3 | - | 26.0 | 23.9 |
C. Jamison
|
G | 7 | 16.3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 25.0 | 80.0 | - | 47.0 | 41.7 |
M. Hill
|
C | 7 | 13.4 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 26.3 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 31.3 | 28.9 |
S. Chandler
|
F | 7 | 10.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.1 | -0.4 | - | - | - | 26.7 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 28.3 | 26.7 |
B. Tarver
|
G | 6 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 44.4 | 42.9 |
T. Turner
|
F | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
A. Nickens
|
F | 6 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG