2011 Team Stats (2 games)
54.0
PPG
88.0
Opp
-30.3
Margin
35.5%
FG%
21.2%
3P%
71.9%
FT%
24.0
RPG
15.0
APG
19.0
TO
81.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 916 (#14) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 862 (#15) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -21.6 (#15) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.003 (#15) | - |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-05-19 | @ | Connecticut Sun | L | 63 - 101 |
| 2011-05-23 | @ | Chicago Sky | L | 45 - 84 |
| 2011-05-27 | vs | New York Liberty | L | 65 - 79 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Yanyan
|
NA | 2 | 23.5 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 10.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 66.7 | - | 56.3 | 55.0 |
D. Yuan
|
F | 2 | 32.0 | 10.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 8.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 25.0 | 80.0 | - | 51.5 | 40.6 |
G. Song
|
NA | 2 | 23.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 20.0 | 83.3 | - | 54.1 | 46.4 |
Z. Shuang
|
F | 2 | 29.0 | 8.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 8.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 35.3 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 43.7 | 38.2 |
Shane Power
|
- | 2 | 15.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Terrence Crawford
|
- | 1 | 13.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 41.0 | 25.0 |
Y. Banban
|
G | 2 | 29.5 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 0.0 | 33.3 | - | 22.0 | 18.2 |
X. Nuo
|
NA | 2 | 14.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 16.7 | 50.0 | - | 30.4 | 27.8 |
David Anderson
|
- | 2 | 12.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
H. Hongpin
|
C | 2 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
C. Xiaojis
|
NA | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
China