Charleston Southern Buccaneers
2026 Team Stats (26 games)
61.8
PPG
73.5
Opp
-11.7
Margin
38.1%
FG%
33.4%
3P%
69.6%
FT%
33.8
RPG
11.7
APG
16.8
TO
79.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 884 (#544) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -5.0 (#362) | HCA +2.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.324 (#541) | AdjO 62.6 | AdjD 70.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.364 (#351) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.341 (#366) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 827 (#522) | RD 158 | GP 26 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Bailey
|
G | 25 | 31.7 | 17.7 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 15.2 | 9.9 | -29 | -1.3 | -1.8 | 39.8 | 32.9 | 75.8 | -3.43 | 51.0 | 45.9 |
C. Ellis
|
G | 26 | 31.9 | 12.9 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 12.6 | 2.2 | -7 | -0.3 | -0.4 | 36.1 | 34.2 | 74.5 | -0.68 | 48.2 | 45.9 |
A. Sra
|
G | 23 | 30.9 | 9.1 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 8.8 | 8.5 | 21 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 37.4 | 37.0 | 77.4 | 2.11 | 48.5 | 45.8 |
A. Nettles
|
G | 9 | 27.3 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 7.1 | 32 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 48.8 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 4.25 | 54.1 | 48.8 |
T. Barbitch
|
G | 26 | 15.6 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 69 | 2.9 | 6.4 | 33.8 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 0.3 | 47.7 | 47.1 |
A. Garcia
|
G | 21 | 11.2 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 13 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 35.4 | 36.2 | 84.6 | 2.83 | 51.9 | 48.7 |
M. Dotson
|
G | 15 | 17.9 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 6.3 | 63 | 3.9 | 10.3 | 44.9 | 0.0 | 73.9 | 1.72 | 51.6 | 44.9 |
N. Jones
|
C | 26 | 19.7 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 92 | 3.8 | 8.4 | 53.2 | 0 | 41.3 | 3.66 | 51.9 | 53.2 |
A. Coulibaly
|
G | 25 | 11.1 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 8 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 33.8 | 23.1 | 76.2 | 0.62 | 44.0 | 38.2 |
C. Davis
|
G | 23 | 12.7 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 14 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 41.9 | 35.3 | 61.5 | -1.86 | 53.3 | 48.8 |
S. Bradley
|
G | 26 | 10.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 6 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 25.0 | -2.45 | 45.5 | 46.1 |
T. Caldwell
|
G | 15 | 23.5 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 29 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 15.4 | 18.8 | 25.0 | 1.66 | 21.6 | 21.2 |
S. Jones
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | 2.3 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 1.59 | - | - |
L. Ortega-Mora
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Naveyah Damon
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG