🐻⬇️🏀

Charleston (WV)

Also known as: Charleston (WV)
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1109 (#91) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1094 (#110) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1119 (#54) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More → -1.2 (#239) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +0.2 (#361) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.544 (#341) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +0.3 More → 0.509 (#275) NetEff +0.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +0.8 More → 0.522 (#397) AdjNet +0.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +0.8 More → 0.525 (#401) AdjNet +0.8
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 64.3 | AdjD 63.6 More → 0.516 (#396) AdjO 64.3 | AdjD 63.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.4 | AdjD 61.5 More → 0.498 (#366) AdjO 61.4 | AdjD 61.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.576 (#285) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.575 (#281) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 97 | GP 23 More → 1134 (#83) RD 97 | GP 23

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-15 vs Slippery Rock - Incomplete score
2025-11-16 @ Gannon - Incomplete score
2025-11-19 vs Virginia St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-22 vs Thomas More - Incomplete score
2025-11-26 @ Edinboro - Incomplete score
2025-12-01 vs Allen - Incomplete score
2025-12-03 vs Glenville St. - Incomplete score
2025-12-06 @ Concord - Incomplete score
2025-12-13 @ Wheeling - Incomplete score
2025-12-20 @ Bluefield St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-03 vs Fairmont St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-10 vs Salem (WV) - Incomplete score
2026-01-14 vs West Va. Wesleyan - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 @ Davis & Elkins - Incomplete score
2026-01-21 vs Concord - Incomplete score
2026-01-24 vs West Virginia St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-28 vs Wheeling - Incomplete score
2026-01-31 @ West Liberty - Incomplete score
2026-02-04 @ Fairmont St. - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 vs Frostburg St. - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Paris Stokes - 19 32.8 14.4 4.0 2.6 1.7 0.3 3.6 11.1 8.4 -51 -2.4 -9.2 41.0 32.1 81.0 -0.3 53.5 45.0
Harper Annarino - 16 33.2 10.9 9.8 1.4 0.5 0.8 2.4 9.1 12.0 -19 -1.0 -6.1 44.1 35.4 77.4 1.58 55.2 52.1
Ksenija Mitric - 17 29.3 9.4 4.6 3.8 0.9 0.0 2.9 9.5 6.2 4 0.2 1.0 31.7 34.2 64.6 0.65 43.7 39.8
Jordan Scully - 18 25.5 7.9 2.2 0.8 0.8 0.1 1.9 7.1 2.8 -42 -2.0 -8.1 40.2 40.3 68.4 -0.95 52.5 50.8
Bridget Womber - 15 19.6 7.5 7.4 0.9 0.3 0.7 2.1 5.6 9.2 -22 -1.2 -17.0 56.0 100.0 43.2 -2.52 55.8 57.1
Livia O'dea - 19 21.1 5.7 2.9 0.8 0.3 0.5 1.4 5.0 3.8 -55 -2.5 -17.0 45.3 28.6 76.5 0.74 53.2 50.5
Natalie Smith - 15 14.1 5.5 4.7 0.7 0.5 0.1 1.1 5.1 5.3 -10 -0.6 -3.2 39.0 26.9 76.2 1.13 48.1 43.5
Kennedi McLean - 19 8.9 2.8 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.1 2.3 1.7 -29 -1.3 -12.8 59.1 0 5.3 -0.55 50.6 59.1
Faith Whalen - 17 9.6 1.8 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.6 1.9 0.5 -42 -2.1 -23.6 31.2 29.6 75.0 -1.95 45.9 43.8
Nevaeh Brooks - 18 13.6 1.8 1.4 0.7 0.4 0.1 1.2 2.6 0.6 -36 -1.7 -12.8 21.7 6.7 73.3 -1.71 30.4 22.8
Noelle Polanco - 15 4.1 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.7 1.3 0.5 4 0.2 5.6 36.8 25.0 100.0 1.9 46.3 44.7
Laynie Binion - 8 4.3 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 1.4 0.0 2 0.2 10.6 27.3 33.3 0 - 40.9 40.9
Laia Santanach Fita - 5 9.2 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.2 -0.2 -25 -5.0 -47.0 33.3 25.0 0 -2.39 41.7 41.7
Mikaella Savva - 9 5.5 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.7 0.1 -35 -3.2 -38.3 16.7 0 0.0 -2.25 15.5 16.7
Sadé Anderson - 4 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 -0.8 -6 -1.2 -60.5 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG