Chaminade Silverswords
2026 Team Stats (3 games)
79.7
PPG
103.7
Opp
-24.0
Margin
42.9%
FG%
35.7%
3P%
63.9%
FT%
21.3
RPG
12.3
APG
11.0
TO
86.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 989 (#518) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -3.4 (#401) | HCA +2.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.438 (#531) | AdjO 73.6 | AdjD 76.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.451 (#371) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.464 (#356) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 837 (#633) | RD 350 | GP 3 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-24 | vs | Washington State Cougars | L | 85 - 90 |
| 2025-11-25 | vs | Texas Longhorns | L | 78 - 119 |
| 2025-11-26 | vs | Boise State Broncos | L | 76 - 102 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Medina
|
- | 3 | 27.0 | 17.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 13.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 46.2 | 45.8 | 66.7 | - | 61.2 | 60.3 |
K. King
|
- | 3 | 31.7 | 14.7 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 11.7 | 11.0 | 105 | 5.0 | 11.7 | 37.1 | 30.8 | 73.7 | 0.58 | 50.7 | 42.9 |
R. Banks II
|
- | 3 | 25.0 | 10.3 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 74 | 3.4 | 6.1 | 52.4 | 20.0 | 72.7 | 0.27 | 60.0 | 54.8 |
K. King
|
- | 3 | 29.7 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 10.3 | 3.7 | 105 | 5.0 | 11.7 | 38.7 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 0.58 | 42.3 | 41.9 |
N. Sasser III
|
- | 3 | 20.0 | 7.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | 43.3 | 40.5 |
F. MacDonald
|
- | 3 | 21.7 | 6.3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 56.2 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 59.4 | 59.4 |
B. Shackelford
|
- | 3 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 80.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 76.5 | 80.0 |
P. Lambrecht
|
- | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 125.0 | 125.0 |
M. Wyche
|
- | 3 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 37.0 | 30.0 |
J. Lehmann
|
- | 2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Q. Adams
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
B. Haddock
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
B. Carpenter
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P. Slater
|
- | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG