Central Okla.
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 997 (#276) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 965 (#324) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 914 (#601) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +4.9 (#123) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +7.1 (#248) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.339 (#429) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.548 (#263) | NetEff +1.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.787 (#279) | AdjNet +11.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.809 (#276) | AdjNet +12.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.660 (#285) | AdjO 69.5 | AdjD 62.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.549 (#256) | AdjO 62.0 | AdjD 59.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.588 (#276) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.572 (#287) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 927 (#329) | RD 93 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Southwest Minn. St. | L | 51 - 66 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | St. Cloud St. | L | 59 - 61 |
| 2025-11-20 | vs | Midwestern St. | W | 65 - 52 |
| 2025-11-24 | vs | Harding | L | 51 - 61 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | UCCS | L | 66 - 80 |
| 2025-12-04 | @ | Pittsburg St. | L | 59 - 62 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | Mo. Southern St. | L | 57 - 75 |
| 2025-12-11 | @ | Rogers St. | L | 63 - 66 |
| 2025-12-16 | vs | Evangel | W | 70 - 65 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Sul Ross St. | W | 75 - 62 |
| 2025-12-30 | vs | McPherson | W | 96 - 44 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Newman | W | 73 - 55 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Ark.-Fort Smith | W | 62 - 54 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Mo. Southern St. | L | 81 - 85 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Pittsburg St. | L | 56 - 84 |
| 2026-01-22 | @ | Neb.-Kearney | L | 57 - 65 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Fort Hays St. | L | 65 - 78 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Newman | W | 67 - 51 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Emporia St. | L | 56 - 65 |
| 2026-02-05 | @ | Northwest Mo. St. | L | 40 - 57 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Missouri Western | L | 71 - 80 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nykaiya Dillard | - | 21 | 18.7 | 12.4 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 11.4 | 5.7 | 19 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 40.2 | 19.2 | 67.4 | 0.9 | 46.5 | 41.2 |
| Kaitlyn McCarn | - | 21 | 30.6 | 11.5 | 5.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 12.7 | 4.4 | 24 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 36.0 | 31.8 | 72.9 | -2.16 | 41.8 | 38.6 |
| Jerney Bennett | - | 21 | 25.8 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 7.9 | 13.0 | 7 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 44.6 | 0.0 | 59.0 | -0.5 | 47.7 | 44.6 |
| Bobbie Fouquet | - | 21 | 23.0 | 8.2 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 9.8 | 4.8 | 10 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 33.7 | 23.3 | 60.0 | -1.96 | 39.6 | 37.8 |
| Olivia Quapaw | - | 21 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 0.4 | 14 | 0.6 | 5.8 | 33.6 | 23.5 | 85.7 | 1.96 | 43.4 | 38.9 |
| Peyton Walker | - | 20 | 28.4 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 30 | 1.4 | 6.5 | 35.2 | 45.2 | 81.8 | 1.91 | 50.8 | 45.1 |
| Kendrick Bailey | - | 21 | 29.1 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 26.5 | 25.9 | 66.7 | -0.7 | 39.6 | 35.5 |
| Harley Harbour | - | 21 | 11.1 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 4.2 | -40 | -1.7 | -14.3 | 39.7 | 0 | 58.8 | -1.81 | 45.2 | 39.7 |
| Talia Pogi | - | 20 | 10.9 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.9 | 0.6 | -4 | -0.2 | -1.7 | 28.6 | 25.0 | 57.1 | 1.36 | 37.5 | 36.4 |
| HaNiya Geretta | - | 14 | 9.6 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 3.9 | 1.1 | -67 | -4.8 | -34.2 | 23.6 | 27.8 | 60.0 | -3.65 | 32.5 | 28.2 |
| Madison Roberts | - | 16 | 5.0 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 10 | 0.6 | 13.5 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 45.5 | 1.02 | 41.1 | 40.0 |
| Parker Simonsen | - | 8 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 14 | 1.6 | 373.3 | 41.7 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.21 | 42.7 | 41.7 |
| Emerie Adams | - | 5 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | -0.2 | 10 | 2.0 | 152.9 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.72 | 14.3 | 14.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG