Catholic
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1070 (#105) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1108 (#92) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.2 (#35) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.957 (#193) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.978 (#25) | NetEff +28.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.966 (#153) | AdjNet +29.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.967 (#153) | AdjNet +28.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.835 (#156) | AdjO 74.7 | AdjD 56.9 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Shenandoah | W | 67 - 61 |
| 2024-11-15 | vs | Wesleyan (CT) | W | 75 - 59 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | RIT | W | 84 - 43 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Elizabethtown | L | 69 - 73 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Wilkes | W | 91 - 34 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Susquehanna | W | 66 - 52 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Moravian | W | 87 - 49 |
| 2024-12-16 | vs | Mt. St. Mary (NY) | W | 66 - 53 |
| 2024-12-17 | vs | Maryville (TN) | W | 74 - 33 |
| 2024-12-29 | vs | Messiah | W | 62 - 47 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | Vassar | W | 69 - 58 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Lycoming | W | 88 - 40 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Drew | W | 78 - 49 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Juniata | W | 90 - 74 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Scranton | L | 55 - 77 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Goucher | W | 96 - 58 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Wilkes | W | 75 - 28 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Susquehanna | W | 75 - 47 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Moravian | W | 68 - 39 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Elizabethtown | W | 70 - 63 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Scranton | L | 53 - 62 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Juniata | W | 74 - 48 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Drew | W | 78 - 62 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Goucher | W | 107 - 63 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Lycoming | W | 77 - 64 |
| 2025-02-25 | vs | Goucher | W | 117 - 71 |
| 2025-02-27 | @ | Elizabethtown | W | 79 - 67 |
| 2025-03-01 | @ | Scranton | L | 62 - 85 |
| 2025-03-07 | vs | SUNY Geneseo | L | 63 - 74 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Scoblick | - | 29 | 27.0 | 14.1 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 10.8 | 13.7 | 111 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 47.8 | 0 | 66.3 | 0.66 | 53.1 | 47.8 |
| Keegan Douglas | - | 29 | 26.9 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 10.6 | 8.5 | 95 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 41.5 | 33.6 | 82.1 | 0.84 | 51.7 | 47.7 |
| Kerry Flaherty | - | 28 | 27.4 | 11.3 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 9.5 | 5.6 | 93 | 3.3 | 3.9 | 41.4 | 41.8 | 71.4 | 0.72 | 57.6 | 56.8 |
| Carly Mulvaney | - | 28 | 29.7 | 10.1 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 9.4 | 11.1 | 100 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 41.7 | 35.4 | 69.0 | 0.66 | 50.1 | 48.1 |
| Amelia Kennedy | - | 27 | 16.2 | 7.0 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 5.4 | 7.6 | 69 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 47.6 | 37.8 | 66.7 | 0.03 | 55.7 | 52.4 |
| Alexa Kenah | - | 28 | 20.0 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 6.0 | 6.7 | 58 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 32.0 | 20.3 | 78.4 | -0.39 | 41.0 | 36.4 |
| Sofia Travieso | - | 27 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 67 | 2.2 | 6.5 | 40.5 | 35.1 | 69.2 | 0.59 | 50.8 | 48.7 |
| Lauren Kraft | - | 25 | 8.6 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 98 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 31.8 | 15.2 | 46.2 | 0.38 | 37.8 | 35.9 |
| Sam Blumenthal | - | 29 | 8.0 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 12 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 40.0 | 0 | 46.2 | -0.43 | 42.2 | 40.0 |
| Ella Iacone | - | 27 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 42 | 1.6 | 6.9 | 44.1 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 0.17 | 54.3 | 54.2 |
| Olivia Boccella | - | 29 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 32 | 1.3 | 6.5 | 35.7 | 39.5 | 75.0 | -0.17 | 54.8 | 53.6 |
| Maggie Hughes | - | 27 | 7.3 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 46 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 22.2 | 20.0 | 75.0 | 0.0 | 39.8 | 25.6 |
| Raquel Guidetti | - | 29 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 121 | 5.0 | 19.4 | 31.2 | 30.8 | 66.7 | 0.26 | 38.5 | 35.4 |
| Lia Villa | - | 27 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 45 | 2.0 | 13.9 | 34.9 | 11.8 | 100.0 | -0.09 | 40.9 | 37.2 |
| Anna Kreinbrook | - | 29 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 19 | 1.1 | 8.9 | 27.3 | 0 | 45.5 | 0.08 | 31.7 | 27.3 |
| Angelina Dragone | - | 9 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 79.8 | 100.0 |
| Delaney Cusack | - | 16 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Lauryn Redcross | - | 23 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Molly Mclaughlin | - | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG