Cameron
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 823 (#501) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 753 (#516) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 767 (#687) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -8.4 (#241) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -5.5 (#447) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.186 (#495) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.049 (#418) | NetEff -22.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.520 (#400) | AdjNet +0.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.543 (#395) | AdjNet +1.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.529 (#381) | AdjO 64.5 | AdjD 63.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.285 (#617) | AdjO 58.4 | AdjD 68.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.235 (#576) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.228 (#588) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 663 (#515) | RD 116 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | @ | N.M. Highlands | L | 62 - 78 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Fort Lewis | L | 82 - 94 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Harding | L | 65 - 77 |
| 2025-11-20 | @ | Southeastern Okla. | L | 64 - 94 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | East Central | L | 63 - 70 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Northwestern Okla. | L | 56 - 83 |
| 2025-12-04 | @ | Eastern N.M. | L | 36 - 76 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | West Tex. A&M | L | 48 - 85 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Lubbock Christian | L | 45 - 61 |
| 2025-12-19 | vs | Pittsburg St. | L | 51 - 73 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Washburn | L | 49 - 78 |
| 2026-01-02 | @ | Tex. A&M-Kingsville | L | 41 - 70 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | UT Permian Basin | L | 47 - 49 |
| 2026-01-15 | @ | Western N.M. | W | 75 - 68 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Sul Ross St. | W | 70 - 64 |
| 2026-01-22 | vs | St. Edward's | L | 56 - 60 |
| 2026-01-29 | vs | Midwestern St. | L | 87 - 92 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Lubbock Christian | L | 47 - 73 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | West Tex. A&M | L | 59 - 75 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Eastern N.M. | L | 47 - 76 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Griggs | - | 15 | 33.3 | 17.7 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 15.1 | 4.7 | -239 | -14.9 | -58.2 | 39.6 | 32.6 | 75.3 | -0.71 | 51.1 | 46.3 |
| Kloe Heidebrecht | - | 19 | 32.4 | 10.5 | 3.9 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 10.7 | 4.1 | -201 | -10.1 | -38.8 | 32.0 | 32.5 | 90.0 | 2.45 | 47.2 | 44.8 |
| Mercedes Mancha | - | 9 | 32.8 | 10.1 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.2 | 2.8 | -57 | -5.2 | -17.7 | 30.4 | 32.3 | 75.0 | 0.49 | 45.1 | 41.3 |
| Aminata Diallo | - | 19 | 22.7 | 7.3 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 6.8 | 5.2 | -131 | -6.5 | -48.9 | 37.7 | 40.0 | 41.1 | -1.82 | 40.5 | 38.5 |
| Emmary Elizondo | - | 20 | 31.4 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 5.9 | 3.5 | -252 | -12.0 | -46.5 | 39.0 | 27.9 | 40.5 | -0.6 | 46.2 | 46.2 |
| Chanelle Davis | - | 19 | 12.9 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 4.2 | -82 | -4.1 | -58.9 | 48.2 | 75.0 | 65.9 | -0.77 | 56.7 | 50.9 |
| Ayonna Cooper | - | 20 | 23.3 | 4.0 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 5.5 | 4.2 | -176 | -8.4 | -44.0 | 26.1 | 14.6 | 62.5 | -3.56 | 32.5 | 28.8 |
| Alexis Parker | - | 17 | 12.1 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 2.6 | -111 | -6.5 | -58.1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 83.3 | -0.49 | 45.7 | 33.3 |
| Kennedy Price | - | 20 | 13.3 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 1.6 | -45 | -2.1 | -16.9 | 28.0 | 29.2 | 44.8 | -1.0 | 38.2 | 35.0 |
| Ayonna Naylor | - | 15 | 7.1 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | -96 | -6.0 | -188.1 | 38.2 | 21.4 | 37.5 | -1.74 | 42.6 | 42.6 |
| Leanna Silas | - | 5 | 9.9 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 0.8 | -14 | -3.5 | -11.1 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 2.94 | 19.7 | 12.5 |
| Leila Ford-Copeland | - | 15 | 6.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | -23 | -1.5 | -44.8 | 61.5 | 33.3 | 0 | 1.01 | 65.4 | 65.4 |
| Ava Alexander | - | 9 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | -11 | -1.2 | -87.1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 1.14 | 33.8 | 33.3 |
| Tiara Neal | - | 15 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | -54 | -3.9 | -129.0 | 27.3 | 16.7 | 0 | -1.91 | 31.8 | 31.8 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG