California Golden Bears
2021 Team Stats (5 games)
38.8
PPG
74.2
Opp
-35.4
Margin
30.1%
FG%
9.5%
3P%
57.6%
FT%
36.8
RPG
7.8
APG
24.0
TO
79.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1071 (#156) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1135 (#121) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.9 (#55) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.427 (#199) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-19 | @ | UCLA Bruins | L | 37 - 71 |
| 2021-01-03 | @ | Arizona Wildcats | L | 33 - 69 |
| 2021-01-10 | vs | Oregon Ducks | L | 41 - 100 |
| 2021-01-24 | vs | UCLA Bruins | - | Preview |
| 2021-02-12 | @ | Oregon Ducks | - | Preview |
| 2021-02-19 | vs | Arizona Wildcats | L | 50 - 59 |
| 2021-02-28 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 33 - 72 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Daniels
|
F | 5 | 37.6 | 13.6 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 14.4 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 36.1 | 7.1 | 62.5 | - | 41.2 | 36.8 |
U. Onyiah
|
F | 5 | 28.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 9.2 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 39.1 | 0 | 35.7 | - | 39.3 | 39.1 |
L. McIntosh
|
G | 5 | 38.0 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 9.2 | -0.4 | - | - | - | 19.6 | 5.9 | 66.7 | - | 26.3 | 20.7 |
E. Lutje Schipholt
|
F | 5 | 32.4 | 4.4 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 4.0 | 8.2 | - | - | - | 45.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 48.6 | 45.0 |
S. Heide
|
F | 2 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 37.5 |
A. Olson
|
G | 4 | 16.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 2.5 | -1.2 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 16.7 | 50.0 | - | 38.3 | 35.0 |
F. Samb
|
C | 5 | 12.2 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 3.0 | -0.4 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 25.2 | 20.0 |
O. Muca
|
G | 5 | 13.8 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | -0.4 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 22.2 | 50.0 | - | 31.3 | 27.3 |
M. Mastrov
|
G | 2 | 36.5 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 7.5 | -5.5 | - | - | - | 6.7 | 11.1 | 0 | - | 10.0 | 10.0 |
S. Richey
|
G | 4 | 7.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG