CEDEVITA OLIMPIJA LJUBLJANA
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1000 (#12) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1036 (#9) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +0.5 (#20) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.507 (#21) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-19 | @ | GRAN CANARIA | W | 79 - 77 |
| 2021-10-27 | vs | MINCIDELICE JL BOURG EN BRESSE | W | 91 - 79 |
| 2021-11-03 | @ | FRUTTI EXTRA BURSASPOR | L | 84 - 93 |
| 2021-11-10 | vs | RATIOPHARM ULM | L | 96 - 101 |
| 2021-11-17 | @ | BUDUCNOST VOLI PODGORICA | L | 60 - 91 |
| 2021-12-08 | vs | VIRTUS SEGAFREDO BOLOGNA | L | 101 - 104 |
| 2021-12-15 | @ | UMANA REYER VENICE | L | 70 - 77 |
| 2021-12-21 | @ | VALENCIA BASKET | W | 97 - 85 |
| 2022-01-19 | vs | GRAN CANARIA | L | 60 - 75 |
| 2022-01-26 | @ | MINCIDELICE JL BOURG EN BRESSE | L | 69 - 76 |
| 2022-02-02 | vs | FRUTTI EXTRA BURSASPOR | W | 103 - 86 |
| 2022-02-09 | @ | RATIOPHARM ULM | W | 104 - 96 |
| 2022-03-08 | vs | BUDUCNOST VOLI PODGORICA | W | 92 - 78 |
| 2022-03-10 | vs | PROMITHEAS PATRAS | W | 98 - 84 |
| 2022-03-16 | @ | VIRTUS SEGAFREDO BOLOGNA | W | 86 - 74 |
| 2022-03-23 | vs | UMANA REYER VENICE | W | 105 - 90 |
| 2022-03-30 | vs | VALENCIA BASKET | W | 82 - 76 |
| 2022-04-06 | @ | PROMITHEAS PATRAS | W | 88 - 67 |
| 2022-04-19 | vs | TURK TELEKOM ANKARA | W | 93 - 80 |
| 2022-04-27 | vs | FRUTTI EXTRA BURSASPOR | L | 83 - 85 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLAZIC, JAKA | - | 19 | 31.1 | 15.4 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 11.6 | 10.9 | 106 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 41.2 | 38.4 | 75.6 | - | - | - |
| MURIC, EDO | - | 20 | 26.7 | 10.4 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 7.4 | 9.7 | 124 | 6.2 | 9.3 | 52.7 | 39.8 | 76.9 | - | - | - |
| PULLEN, JACOB | - | 20 | 23.4 | 14.0 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 11.4 | 6.5 | -10 | -0.5 | -0.9 | 39.9 | 33.6 | 76.1 | - | - | - |
| FERRELL, YOGI | - | 15 | 27.6 | 15.3 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 9.7 | 11.5 | 122 | 8.1 | 11.8 | 50.0 | 45.9 | 93.6 | - | - | - |
| EJIM, MELVIN | - | 17 | 24.2 | 8.4 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 5.6 | 8.1 | -1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 51.6 | 51.6 | 90.3 | - | - | - |
| AUGUSTE, ZACH | - | 20 | 18.5 | 8.7 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 5.3 | 8.8 | -7 | -0.3 | -0.8 | 68.2 | 33.3 | 46.3 | - | - | - |
| OMIC, ALEN | - | 15 | 22.5 | 8.8 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 11.9 | 91 | 6.1 | 10.8 | 71.8 | 66.7 | 53.3 | - | - | - |
| DRAGIC, ZORAN | - | 12 | 26.1 | 10.7 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 8.7 | 7.9 | 76 | 6.3 | 9.7 | 45.2 | 27.3 | 71.0 | - | - | - |
| RADOVANOVIC, MARKO | - | 18 | 10.4 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 3.6 | -21 | -1.2 | -4.5 | 56.4 | 44.4 | 75.0 | - | - | - |
| HODZIC, ALEN | - | 14 | 6.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | -19 | -1.4 | -8.2 | 33.3 | 30.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - |
| KEENE, MARCUS | - | 4 | 15.0 | 9.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 4.2 | -1 | -0.2 | -0.7 | 56.5 | 43.8 | 60.0 | - | - | - |
| SCUKA, LUKA | - | 20 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | -36 | -1.8 | -23.9 | 17.6 | 0.0 | 83.3 | - | - | - |
| RUPNIK, LUKA | - | 6 | 9.3 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -0.2 | -37 | -6.2 | -26.4 | 16.7 | 18.2 | 75.0 | - | - | - |
| CARMICHAEL, JACKIE | - | 5 | 11.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | -9 | -1.8 | -6.6 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | - | - |
| DUSCAK, DAN | - | 14 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | -0.5 | -22 | -1.6 | -18.4 | 14.3 | 10.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - |
| DIMEC, ZIGA | - | 5 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | -10 | -2.0 | -10.9 | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - |
| HABOT, BLAZ | - | 8 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | -5 | -0.6 | -23.3 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | - | - |
| MULALIC, MIRKO | - | 2 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 5 | 2.5 | 47.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - |
| DANEU, ZIGA | - | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -11 | -5.5 | -220.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG