Brooklyn Nets
2010 Team Stats (85 games)
89.2
PPG
102.8
Opp
-8.7
Margin
43.0%
FG%
32.0%
3P%
77.8%
FT%
38.4
RPG
18.1
APG
14.1
TO
101.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2009-2010
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 871 (#311) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +9.7 (#30) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.424 (#34) | - |
2010 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-12-02 | vs | DAL | L | 101 - 117 |
| 2009-12-04 | vs | CHA | W | 97 - 91 |
| 2009-12-06 | @ | NYK | L | 97 - 106 |
| 2009-12-08 | @ | CHI | W | 103 - 101 |
| 2009-12-09 | vs | GSW | L | 89 - 105 |
| 2009-12-11 | @ | IND | L | 91 - 107 |
| 2009-12-13 | @ | ATL | L | 107 - 130 |
| 2009-12-15 | @ | CLE | L | 89 - 99 |
| 2009-12-16 | vs | UTA | L | 92 - 108 |
| 2009-12-18 | @ | TOR | L | 95 - 118 |
| 2009-12-19 | vs | LAL | L | 84 - 103 |
| 2009-12-23 | vs | MIN | L | 99 - 103 |
| 2009-12-26 | vs | HOU | L | 93 - 98 |
| 2009-12-28 | vs | OKC | L | 89 - 105 |
| 2009-12-30 | vs | NYK | W | 104 - 95 |
| 2010-01-02 | vs | CLE | L | 86 - 94 |
| 2010-01-05 | vs | MIL | L | 76 - 98 |
| 2010-01-06 | @ | ATL | L | 89 - 119 |
| 2010-01-08 | @ | NOH | L | 99 - 103 |
| 2010-01-10 | @ | SAS | L | 85 - 97 |
| 2010-01-13 | vs | BOS | L | 87 - 111 |
| 2010-01-15 | vs | IND | L | 105 - 121 |
| 2010-01-18 | @ | LAC | L | 95 - 106 |
| 2010-01-20 | @ | PHX | L | 94 - 118 |
| 2010-01-22 | @ | GSW | L | 79 - 111 |
| 2010-01-23 | @ | UTA | L | 83 - 116 |
| 2010-01-27 | vs | LAC | W | 103 - 87 |
| 2010-01-29 | vs | WAS | L | 79 - 81 |
| 2010-01-31 | vs | PHI | L | 79 - 83 |
| 2010-02-05 | @ | BOS | L | 87 - 96 |
| 2010-02-06 | @ | DET | L | 92 - 99 |
| 2010-02-09 | @ | CLE | L | 97 - 104 |
| 2010-02-10 | vs | MIL | L | 77 - 97 |
| 2010-02-16 | @ | CHA | W | 103 - 94 |
| 2010-02-17 | vs | MIA | L | 84 - 87 |
| 2010-02-19 | vs | TOR | L | 89 - 106 |
| 2010-02-21 | vs | MEM | L | 94 - 104 |
| 2010-02-23 | vs | POR | L | 93 - 102 |
| 2010-02-27 | @ | BOS | W | 104 - 96 |
| 2010-02-28 | vs | WAS | L | 85 - 89 |
| 2010-03-03 | vs | CLE | L | 92 - 111 |
| 2010-03-05 | vs | ORL | L | 87 - 97 |
| 2010-03-06 | @ | NYK | W | 113 - 93 |
| 2010-03-08 | @ | MEM | L | 101 - 107 |
| 2010-03-10 | @ | DAL | L | 87 - 96 |
| 2010-03-12 | @ | OKC | L | 102 - 104 |
| 2010-03-13 | @ | HOU | L | 108 - 116 |
| 2010-03-16 | vs | ATL | L | 84 - 108 |
| 2010-03-17 | @ | PHI | L | 97 - 108 |
| 2010-03-22 | vs | MIA | L | 89 - 99 |
| 2010-03-24 | vs | SAC | W | 93 - 79 |
| 2010-03-26 | vs | DET | W | 118 - 110 |
| 2010-03-27 | @ | CHI | L | 83 - 106 |
| 2010-03-29 | vs | SAS | W | 90 - 84 |
| 2010-03-31 | vs | PHX | L | 105 - 116 |
| 2010-04-03 | vs | NOH | W | 115 - 87 |
| 2010-04-04 | @ | WAS | L | 99 - 109 |
| 2010-04-07 | @ | MIL | L | 89 - 108 |
| 2010-04-09 | vs | CHI | W | 127 - 116 |
| 2010-04-10 | @ | IND | L | 102 - 115 |
| 2010-04-12 | vs | CHA | L | 95 - 105 |
| 2010-04-14 | @ | MIA | L | 86 - 94 |
2010 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brook Lopez
|
G | 62 | 36.7 | 18.9 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 13.5 | 16.3 | - | - | - | 50.3 | 0.0 | 82.1 | - | 57.8 | 50.3 |
| Devin Harris | G | 54 | 34.7 | 16.9 | 3.1 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 13.6 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 41.2 | 28.9 | 80.2 | - | 52.1 | 44.8 |
| Courtney Lee | G | 58 | 34.2 | 13.1 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 11.4 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 44.7 | 34.2 | 87.9 | - | 53.4 | 49.8 |
| Jianlian Yi | G | 45 | 31.3 | 12.4 | 7.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 11.0 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 41.0 | 40.5 | 79.5 | - | 48.8 | 42.5 |
| Rafer Alston | G | 10 | 20.8 | 10.0 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 10.5 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 35.2 | 30.6 | 83.3 | - | 44.3 | 40.5 |
| Chris Douglas-Roberts | G | 50 | 23.3 | 8.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 7.4 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 44.5 | 22.9 | 82.5 | - | 50.5 | 45.6 |
| Terrence Williams | G | 58 | 20.8 | 8.1 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 7.7 | 6.9 | - | - | - | 41.9 | 33.3 | 75.5 | - | 47.8 | 43.9 |
Kris Humphries
|
G | 41 | 20.1 | 8.0 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 43.7 | 0.0 | 70.1 | - | 50.2 | 43.7 |
| Jarvis Hayes | G | 41 | 22.3 | 7.6 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 7.2 | 3.9 | - | - | - | 41.2 | 33.3 | 73.3 | - | 51.2 | 50.5 |
| Keyon Dooling | G | 52 | 17.9 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 6.2 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 40.3 | 38.6 | 77.0 | - | 52.5 | 49.5 |
| Bobby Simmons | G | 9 | 12.9 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 44.4 | 83.3 | - | 55.7 | 50.0 |
| Josh Boone | G | 45 | 15.6 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 6.7 | - | - | - | 54.9 | 0 | 30.2 | - | 52.5 | 54.9 |
| Trenton Hassell | G | 39 | 16.1 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 38.8 | 0.0 | 72.7 | - | 45.1 | 38.8 |
| Tony Battie | G | 15 | 8.5 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 35.0 | 25.0 | 70.0 | - | 40.5 | 36.2 |
| Eduardo Najera | G | 5 | 13.6 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | - | 32.8 | 36.7 |
| Sean Williams | G | 7 | 7.7 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 38.5 | 0 | 62.5 | - | 45.4 | 38.5 |
| Chris Quinn | G | 23 | 8.3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 27.6 | 100.0 | - | 43.6 | 41.2 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG