Bridgewater St.
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 890 (#418) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 839 (#428) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +5.4 (#130) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.576 (#421) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.731 (#150) | NetEff +7.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.636 (#329) | AdjNet +4.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.630 (#329) | AdjNet +4.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.548 (#333) | AdjO 67.5 | AdjD 65.4 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Bryant | L | 57 - 80 |
| 2024-11-13 | @ | Babson | W | 79 - 74 |
| 2024-11-15 | vs | MIT | W | 70 - 61 |
| 2024-11-22 | vs | Eastern Conn. St. | W | 79 - 74 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Emerson | W | 57 - 40 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Rhode Island Col. | W | 83 - 75 |
| 2024-12-03 | vs | WPI | W | 63 - 61 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | UMass Dartmouth | W | 99 - 85 |
| 2024-12-10 | vs | Brandeis | L | 64 - 70 |
| 2024-12-28 | vs | Dickinson | L | 52 - 71 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | WashU | L | 50 - 64 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Smith | L | 50 - 83 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Salem St. | L | 79 - 90 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Framingham St. | W | 77 - 57 |
| 2025-01-13 | vs | Wheaton (MA) | W | 67 - 54 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Worcester St. | W | 69 - 65 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Fitchburg St. | W | 92 - 52 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Westfield St. | W | 81 - 68 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Salem St. | W | 68 - 56 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Framingham St. | W | 72 - 53 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Worcester St. | W | 71 - 66 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Fitchburg St. | W | 85 - 58 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Westfield St. | W | 81 - 52 |
| 2025-02-27 | vs | Westfield St. | W | 72 - 46 |
| 2025-03-01 | vs | Framingham St. | W | 76 - 65 |
| 2025-03-07 | @ | Carnegie Mellon | L | 58 - 69 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kylie Grassi | - | 26 | 33.7 | 17.3 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 15.5 | 9.3 | 108 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 34.6 | 29.2 | 72.7 | 0.28 | 46.7 | 39.6 |
| Kylee Piche | - | 26 | 32.6 | 10.8 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 9.9 | 11.5 | 124 | 5.6 | 6.2 | 45.1 | 66.7 | 53.5 | 1.06 | 47.5 | 45.5 |
| Arielle Cleveland | - | 26 | 24.8 | 8.0 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 7.8 | 9.3 | 90 | 4.5 | 6.1 | 36.3 | 31.0 | 55.6 | 0.69 | 46.7 | 45.1 |
| Jessica D'Amours | - | 4 | 22.2 | 7.2 | 4.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 4.2 | 76 | 3.6 | 5.2 | 32.1 | 37.5 | 100.0 | 0.54 | 46.0 | 37.5 |
| Haley Burchhardt | - | 26 | 19.5 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 107 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 30.9 | 32.4 | 77.2 | 0.74 | 45.4 | 38.3 |
| Lexi Thompson | - | 25 | 17.0 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 6.1 | 2.9 | -5 | -0.2 | -0.4 | 38.8 | 0.0 | 54.9 | -0.22 | 41.8 | 38.8 |
| Sophie Bradbury | - | 17 | 10.2 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 19 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 29.9 | 32.3 | 56.5 | 0.67 | 42.9 | 40.7 |
| Chloe Azoff | - | 17 | 7.6 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 47 | 2.5 | 6.2 | 35.6 | 26.5 | 75.0 | 0.28 | 45.5 | 44.5 |
| Jordan Peebles | - | 24 | 13.9 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 47.8 | 0 | 61.4 | 0.6 | 52.7 | 47.8 |
| Mairead Gallagher | - | 25 | 14.7 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 50 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 44.1 | 33.3 | 61.5 | -0.31 | 52.8 | 48.5 |
| Ashleigh Johnson | - | 12 | 5.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 23 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 40.0 | 16.7 | 50.0 | -0.3 | 44.7 | 43.3 |
| Bridgitt O'sullivan- | - | 8 | 7.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 23.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.25 | 28.0 | 23.5 |
| Eryn Rice | - | 15 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 9.1 | 50.0 | -0.45 | 28.1 | 27.1 |
| Emily Quinn | - | 14 | 5.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 21 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 18.8 | 11.1 | 75.0 | -0.13 | 28.2 | 21.9 |
| Shania Gardner | - | 6 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | -34 | -4.2 | -28.4 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.58 | 16.9 | 12.5 |
| Bridgitt O'Sullivan-Van Etten | - | 4 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Karlie Cosme | - | 6 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG