Bradley Braves
2021 Team Stats (6 games)
65.0
PPG
67.2
Opp
-2.2
Margin
42.6%
FG%
37.2%
3P%
80.5%
FT%
30.5
RPG
12.0
APG
12.2
TO
72.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1112 (#127) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1125 (#127) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +20.3 (#159) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.507 (#168) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-19 | @ | Missouri State Bears | L | 56 - 62 |
| 2021-02-20 | @ | Missouri State Bears | L | 62 - 75 |
| 2021-03-12 | @ | Northern Iowa Panthers | W | 62 - 59 |
| 2021-03-13 | vs | Loyola Chicago Ramblers | W | 70 - 56 |
| 2021-03-14 | @ | Drake Bulldogs | W | 78 - 70 |
| 2021-03-22 | @ | Texas Longhorns | L | 62 - 81 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G. Haack
|
G | 6 | 37.3 | 18.8 | 5.3 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 12.2 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 46.6 | 35.9 | 86.1 | - | 63.6 | 56.2 |
L. Petree
|
G | 6 | 32.7 | 16.8 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 14.3 | 8.3 | - | - | - | 39.5 | 32.3 | 88.5 | - | 51.8 | 45.3 |
M. Petree
|
G | 6 | 22.0 | 7.7 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 47.4 | 36.4 | 75.0 | - | 55.4 | 52.6 |
N. White
|
F | 6 | 24.8 | 6.5 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 39.6 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 39.9 | 39.6 |
T. Koenig
|
G | 6 | 33.5 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 5.8 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 37.1 | 42.9 | 100.0 | - | 51.6 | 50.0 |
E. Marsh
|
F | 6 | 27.3 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 63.2 | 55.6 | 80.0 | - | 77.8 | 76.3 |
T. Danso
|
F | 6 | 9.3 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 46.3 | 45.5 |
U. Ufochukwu
|
C | 6 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 30.7 | 25.0 |
I. Fitch
|
F | 4 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
C. Rice
|
G | 6 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 20.5 | 25.0 |
A. Interrante
|
G | 3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
V. Roberts
|
F | 3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | -0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG