Bluffton
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 968 (#304) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 918 (#345) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +1.7 (#168) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.464 (#468) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.474 (#246) | NetEff -0.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.392 (#416) | AdjNet -3.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.380 (#414) | AdjNet -4.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.435 (#416) | AdjO 59.2 | AdjD 62.0 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Olivet | L | 78 - 79 |
| 2024-11-12 | @ | Kenyon | W | 65 - 40 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Kalamazoo | W | 59 - 56 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Albion | W | 57 - 56 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Heidelberg | W | 78 - 53 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Mt. St. Joseph | L | 66 - 73 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Rose-Hulman | W | 70 - 54 |
| 2024-12-14 | @ | Transylvania | L | 51 - 67 |
| 2024-12-18 | @ | Berea | L | 57 - 59 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Adrian | W | 65 - 54 |
| 2024-12-30 | vs | Defiance | W | 62 - 44 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Hanover | L | 38 - 61 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Anderson (IN) | L | 66 - 76 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Franklin | L | 72 - 75 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Earlham | W | 73 - 59 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Berea | L | 67 - 69 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Mt. St. Joseph | W | 68 - 66 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Franklin | L | 60 - 71 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Manchester | W | 65 - 56 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Hanover | L | 57 - 83 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Earlham | L | 66 - 70 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Transylvania | L | 45 - 50 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Manchester | W | 66 - 51 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Rose-Hulman | L | 67 - 76 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Anderson (IN) | L | 57 - 63 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Transylvania | L | 52 - 58 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Brown | - | 26 | 32.0 | 15.0 | 7.6 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 11.7 | 11.3 | -36 | -1.6 | -1.0 | 39.5 | 41.2 | 83.1 | -0.06 | 51.4 | 40.6 |
| Kayla Prigge | - | 26 | 29.5 | 8.9 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 10.5 | 4.1 | -10 | -0.4 | -0.5 | 29.3 | 27.3 | 57.9 | 0.07 | 38.7 | 36.3 |
| Lacie Fenstermaker | - | 26 | 23.3 | 8.4 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 6.7 | 9.8 | -67 | -1.9 | -2.2 | 49.1 | 0.0 | 62.8 | -0.56 | 52.8 | 49.1 |
| Rachel Clark | - | 26 | 31.7 | 8.1 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 7.2 | 6.0 | -79 | -2.2 | -2.4 | 39.9 | 32.0 | 78.3 | -0.26 | 50.4 | 46.3 |
| Tamron Brinkman | - | 26 | 20.9 | 7.3 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 6.1 | 5.1 | -21 | -0.8 | -1.4 | 48.4 | 33.3 | 82.9 | -0.41 | 53.4 | 48.7 |
| Lindsey Smith | - | 26 | 22.6 | 6.0 | 7.1 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 10.2 | 13 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 46.6 | 0.0 | 42.5 | 0.22 | 46.8 | 46.6 |
| Mackenzea Townsend | - | 26 | 8.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 4.1 | -18 | -0.6 | -1.2 | 50.9 | 0 | 72.7 | 0.0 | 55.5 | 50.9 |
| Alexis Stevely | - | 26 | 7.6 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 0.3 | -25 | -0.8 | -1.5 | 28.8 | 23.2 | 62.5 | 0.04 | 39.2 | 37.7 |
| Katie Sims | - | 25 | 8.3 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 0.2 | -37 | -1.4 | -4.1 | 28.4 | 28.9 | 0.0 | -0.4 | 37.6 | 38.1 |
| Kyla Columber | - | 21 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 22.4 | 28.1 | 50.0 | -0.04 | 33.7 | 31.6 |
| Erin Schafelberger | - | 23 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | -6 | -0.5 | -4.1 | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.1 | 40.5 | 33.3 |
| Jessica Moore | - | 23 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | -31 | -1.4 | -3.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | -0.14 | 17.1 | 0.0 |
| Sharon Keefer | - | 25 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Lillian Wakefield | - | 25 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | -17 | -1.7 | -14.2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.25 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Emma Levan | - | 23 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG