Bloomfield
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -14.0 (#297) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.161 (#505) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.160 (#321) | NetEff -12.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.064 (#616) | AdjNet -23.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.063 (#617) | AdjNet -22.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.214 (#611) | AdjO 61.2 | AdjD 75.5 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Saint Michael's | L | 57 - 83 |
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Southern N.H. | W | 62 - 57 |
| 2024-11-13 | vs | Staten Island | W | 72 - 67 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Dist. Columbia | L | 61 - 71 |
| 2024-11-21 | vs | Bowie St. | W | 70 - 66 |
| 2024-11-30 | @ | Southern Conn. St. | L | 39 - 112 |
| 2024-12-03 | @ | Bridgeport | L | 49 - 57 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Caldwell | L | 56 - 65 |
| 2024-12-12 | vs | Lincoln (PA) | L | 61 - 67 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Bentley | L | 48 - 86 |
| 2025-01-04 | @ | Goldey-Beacom | L | 66 - 74 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Holy Family | L | 50 - 77 |
| 2025-01-14 | vs | Dominican (NY) | L | 66 - 81 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Chestnut Hill | L | 80 - 84 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Felician | W | 78 - 68 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Wilmington (DE) | W | 75 - 58 |
| 2025-01-28 | vs | Post | W | 59 - 45 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Jefferson | L | 62 - 75 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Bridgeport | L | 69 - 75 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Georgian Court | L | 66 - 72 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taneshia Tucker | - | 20 | 34.1 | 16.7 | 6.0 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 14.2 | 10.2 | -26 | -1.2 | -1.2 | 37.5 | 34.7 | 82.3 | 0.16 | 51.0 | 44.7 |
| Kamrin Babbs | - | 19 | 32.2 | 11.7 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 13.1 | 8.2 | -59 | -2.8 | -2.6 | 32.3 | 24.2 | 60.0 | -0.36 | 40.1 | 36.9 |
| Bianca Ellis | - | 19 | 25.0 | 9.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 10.8 | 0.7 | -45 | -2.0 | -2.6 | 31.7 | 31.5 | 75.0 | -0.21 | 44.8 | 44.1 |
| Anisha Able | - | 20 | 23.7 | 8.5 | 6.3 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 7.8 | 7.8 | -22 | -0.9 | -1.1 | 42.0 | 0.0 | 71.7 | -0.1 | 47.1 | 42.0 |
| Serenity Burgess | - | 19 | 20.9 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 5.6 | 5.1 | -30 | -1.4 | -1.2 | 39.6 | 23.1 | 46.7 | -0.83 | 41.7 | 41.0 |
| Tamorie Wilson | - | 19 | 17.5 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 2.6 | -5 | -0.2 | -0.4 | 30.3 | 23.8 | 40.5 | 0.03 | 35.4 | 33.1 |
| Mia Martinez | - | 20 | 22.9 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 5.0 | 3.9 | -52 | -2.2 | -2.7 | 25.7 | 18.0 | 61.9 | -0.05 | 33.6 | 30.2 |
| Ania Martinez | - | 20 | 11.3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 1.1 | -37 | -1.5 | -3.3 | 30.8 | 21.7 | 75.0 | 0.03 | 37.2 | 35.6 |
| Cianni Thompson | - | 15 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.6 | 23.8 | 75.0 | -0.02 | 39.0 | 36.2 |
| Tianna Mckinley | - | 8 | 12.1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 1.8 | -5 | -0.4 | -1.1 | 33.3 | 42.9 | 0 | -0.07 | 43.3 | 43.3 |
| Tyrah Smith | - | 8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | -12 | -1.5 | -4.4 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.03 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Jayleen Valero | - | 7 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | -0.6 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 16.7 | 0 | - | 21.4 | 21.4 |
| Marcela Banuelos | - | 6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Mariah Charles | - | 10 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | -5 | -0.6 | -3.9 | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.03 | 12.9 | 0.0 |
| Faith Bada | - | 12 | 4.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.2 | 10.5 | 0.0 |
| Jayleen Valera | - | 4 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | -0.8 | -23 | -3.8 | -15.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Kayla Oliphant | - | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG