🐻⬇️🏀

Benedictine (IL)

Also known as: Benedictine (IL)
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1130 (#99) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1107 (#139) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1090 (#107) HCA +62 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More → +4.4 (#168) HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +1.1 (#353) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.508 (#444) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +3.9 More → 0.623 (#312) NetEff +3.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -5.5 More → 0.347 (#433) AdjNet -5.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -5.7 More → 0.337 (#436) AdjNet -5.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 62.3 | AdjD 66.0 More → 0.417 (#427) AdjO 62.3 | AdjD 66.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.7 | AdjD 63.4 More → 0.617 (#213) AdjO 68.7 | AdjD 63.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.570 (#316) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.591 (#304) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 108 | GP 21 More → 1082 (#202) RD 108 | GP 21

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-07 @ Buena Vista - Incomplete score
2025-11-08 vs North Central (MN) - Incomplete score
2025-11-10 vs Beloit - Incomplete score
2025-11-14 @ WashU - Incomplete score
2025-11-15 vs Rose-Hulman - Incomplete score
2025-11-18 vs Knox - Incomplete score
2025-11-25 vs North Central (IL) - Incomplete score
2025-12-10 @ Aurora - Incomplete score
2025-12-14 @ Whitworth - Incomplete score
2025-12-17 @ Monmouth (IL) - Incomplete score
2026-01-10 @ Lakeland - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 vs Wis. Lutheran - Incomplete score
2026-01-21 @ Illinois Tech - Incomplete score
2026-01-24 @ MSOE - Incomplete score
2026-01-28 vs Rockford - Incomplete score
2026-01-31 vs St. Norbert - Incomplete score
2026-02-04 vs Concordia Chicago - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 @ Marian (WI) - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Allison Jarvis - 18 28.5 14.6 5.4 1.2 2.2 0.2 2.2 10.3 11.0 120 6.3 25.1 47.8 34.6 76.7 2.65 58.5 52.7
Abby Drendel - 16 25.4 11.0 5.2 1.3 1.3 0.1 1.2 8.1 9.8 91 5.1 31.0 45.7 30.4 63.8 2.32 55.2 51.2
Catey Carney - 18 16.1 10.1 2.6 0.8 1.1 0.2 1.3 9.7 3.6 89 4.9 29.4 39.1 28.9 79.2 3.85 49.0 46.6
Makenzie Carroll - 18 20.1 8.4 2.7 1.4 1.0 0.2 2.2 7.3 4.3 -20 -1.1 -5.2 42.0 27.8 62.7 -5.49 49.5 45.8
Megan Duzansky - 18 21.0 6.8 4.4 1.7 1.5 0.4 1.2 6.5 7.1 71 3.7 20.1 35.9 30.0 60.0 0.39 45.0 41.0
Hailey Bachmann - 18 24.2 6.2 4.7 1.3 1.4 0.4 2.1 5.8 6.3 72 3.8 17.5 40.4 32.1 68.8 -1.66 50.4 48.6
Alexis Schueler - 18 25.3 5.0 2.6 2.6 0.8 0.0 2.0 5.7 3.3 81 4.3 18.1 31.4 19.3 75.0 2.16 40.6 36.8
Shiane Johnson - 12 8.9 3.3 1.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.5 3.3 1.2 22 1.7 18.1 37.5 33.3 71.4 0.59 46.4 43.8
Emily Rich - 18 11.6 3.2 1.9 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.9 3.8 2.2 61 3.2 30.5 25.0 25.0 100.0 1.32 40.5 36.8
Hallie Crane - 4 5.8 2.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.8 0.5 16 3.2 67.8 42.9 42.9 0 - 64.3 64.3
Addison Bryant - 17 7.2 2.1 2.4 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.3 1.2 3.9 45 2.5 33.5 60.0 25.0 57.9 0.24 63.5 62.5
Luella Sheehan - 4 3.2 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 12 2.4 48.4 37.5 50.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Kaitlyn Sidlo - 11 5.0 1.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.4 0.5 -21 -1.6 -41.3 33.3 25.0 100.0 -2.82 47.2 43.3
Makayla Chism - 13 4.4 1.2 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.5 0.6 -5 -0.4 -11.7 31.6 18.2 33.3 -2.43 37.0 36.8
Olympia Kokkines - 16 9.5 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.6 1.5 1.5 98 5.8 49.6 33.3 16.7 0 2.72 37.5 37.5
Morgan Pennington - 4 2.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.2 4 1.0 72.2 66.7 0 0.0 - 58.1 66.7
Cami Hurt - 12 4.2 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.6 -0.1 -12 -1.2 -47.2 28.6 0.0 50.0 -0.48 34.2 28.6

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG