Baylor
2012 Team Stats (30 games)
77.6
PPG
52.6
Opp
+25.0
Margin
48.4%
FG%
35.0%
3P%
71.6%
FT%
40.5
RPG
18.0
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
83.2
Adj PPG
43.9
Adj Opp PPG
#2
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1821 (#1) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1649 (#1) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1363 (#1) | HCA +78 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +41.7 (#2) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +41.0 (#1) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.991 (#2) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 1.000 (#2) | AdjNet +65.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 1.000 (#2) | AdjNet +66.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.973 (#2) | AdjO 83.2 | AdjD 43.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.943 (#2) | AdjO 77.7 | AdjD 46.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.990 (#1) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.988 (#1) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1629 (#1) | RD 91 | GP 40 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brittney Griner
|
NA | 30 | 0.0 | 23.5 | 9.3 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 14.6 | 24.0 | 703 | 29 | 24.2 | 31.3 | 60.3 | 50.0 | 81.4 | 9.87 | 66.1 | 60.4 |
B. Pope
|
NA | 5 | 0.0 | 11.4 | 6.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 159 | 25 | 6.4 | 19.5 | 53.5 | 0 | 37.9 | 2.05 | 51.1 | 53.5 |
D. Williams
|
NA | 24 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 9.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 8.2 | 12.4 | 542 | 28 | 19.4 | 31.1 | 53.0 | 0.0 | 72.3 | 4.93 | 55.8 | 53.0 |
K. Hayden
|
NA | 28 | 0.0 | 8.6 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 7.0 | 8.1 | 511 | 28 | 18.2 | 29.0 | 40.3 | 41.5 | 81.4 | 3.26 | 53.4 | 47.2 |
J. Madden
|
NA | 28 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 524 | 29 | 18.1 | 29.0 | 33.3 | 23.0 | 57.1 | 4.07 | 41.1 | 38.4 |
T. Condrey
|
NA | 5 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 4.8 | 328 | 28 | 11.7 | 27.7 | 41.2 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 5.95 | 50.6 | 47.1 |
A. Field
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | 0 | 23 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.51 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
L. Palmer
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -32 | 21 | -1.5 | -9.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2.04 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG