Baylor
2011 Team Stats (32 games)
78.1
PPG
53.9
Opp
+24.2
Margin
46.8%
FG%
38.9%
3P%
74.0%
FT%
40.3
RPG
16.2
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
82.6
Adj PPG
45.8
Adj Opp PPG
#2
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1580 (#5) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1533 (#2) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1258 (#5) | HCA +81 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +38.9 (#2) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +34.4 (#5) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.987 (#2) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.999 (#2) | AdjNet +60.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.999 (#2) | AdjNet +61.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.966 (#2) | AdjO 82.6 | AdjD 45.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.912 (#5) | AdjO 76.6 | AdjD 50.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.982 (#3) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.977 (#3) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1503 (#3) | RD 94 | GP 37 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brittney Griner
|
NA | 32 | 0.0 | 23.0 | 7.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 4.6 | 2.2 | 14.8 | 20.3 | 601 | 28 | 21.5 | 29.3 | 54.1 | 0 | 78.3 | 8.26 | 61.5 | 54.1 |
D. Williams
|
NA | 18 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 7.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 7.4 | 9.8 | 239 | 20 | 11.9 | 22.4 | 54.9 | 0 | 71.0 | 1.42 | 57.3 | 54.9 |
M. Jones
|
G | 32 | 0.0 | 8.1 | 6.8 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 13.8 | 605 | 28 | 21.6 | 31.2 | 47.0 | 37.7 | 77.9 | 10.05 | 59.5 | 54.1 |
K. Hayden
|
NA | 23 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 371 | 28 | 13.2 | 25.7 | 39.5 | 39.0 | 87.5 | 1.48 | 53.3 | 45.7 |
B. Pope
|
NA | 14 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 262 | 28 | 9.4 | 26.3 | 40.2 | 0 | 54.5 | 1.79 | 44.0 | 40.2 |
L. Palmer
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 43 | 16 | 2.7 | 14.2 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.49 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
J. Madden
|
NA | 12 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 260 | 28 | 9.3 | 23.2 | 31.1 | 20.8 | 75.0 | -1.12 | 41.8 | 36.7 |
S. Washington
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.81 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG