Baylor
2009 Team Stats (30 games)
68.3
PPG
-
Opp
-
Margin
41.6%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
67.1%
FT%
38.7
RPG
11.1
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
72.9
Adj PPG
50.8
Adj Opp PPG
#11
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1536 (#8) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1399 (#8) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1184 (#11) | HCA +85 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +23.8 (#12) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +21.1 (#18) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.897 (#23) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.988 (#11) | AdjNet +38.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.989 (#11) | AdjNet +38.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.882 (#11) | AdjO 72.9 | AdjD 50.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.772 (#20) | AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 53.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.932 (#10) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.921 (#10) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1421 (#6) | RD 95 | GP 35 |
2009 Schedule & Results
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Wilson
|
G | 22 | 0.0 | 15.6 | 9.9 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 11.9 | 17.0 | - | - | - | - | 51.7 | 0 | 55.2 | - | 53.8 | 51.7 |
J. Morrow
|
G | 29 | 0.0 | 11.6 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 11.8 | 3.2 | - | - | - | - | 36.5 | 33.1 | 73.7 | - | 45.6 | 42.8 |
J. Player
|
G | 30 | 0.0 | 10.4 | 5.6 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 9.0 | 8.5 | - | - | - | - | 44.6 | 35.6 | 71.6 | - | 51.2 | 47.6 |
M. Jones
|
G | 6 | 0.0 | 8.7 | 6.7 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 6.0 | 12.5 | - | - | - | - | 52.8 | 30.0 | 73.3 | - | 61.0 | 56.9 |
R. Allison
|
F | 26 | 0.0 | 7.8 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 7.7 | 6.9 | - | - | - | - | 38.8 | 25.0 | 53.0 | - | 43.9 | 41.5 |
K. Griffin
|
G | 25 | 0.0 | 7.2 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 6.5 | 6.7 | - | - | - | - | 33.1 | 31.6 | 75.6 | - | 45.4 | 36.8 |
M. Medlock
|
G | 4 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 7.2 | 5.2 | - | - | - | - | 27.6 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 36.5 | 27.6 |
A. Field
|
NA | 7 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 2.3 | - | - | - | - | 31.8 | 0.0 | 58.3 | - | 38.5 | 31.8 |
W. Zachariason
|
F | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG