🐻⬇️🏀

Barton

Also known as: Barton
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1066 (#115) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1053 (#188) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1051 (#137) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More → -1.5 (#243) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +2.5 (#321) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.305 (#441) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +1.8 More → 0.564 (#258) NetEff +1.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -11.3 More → 0.214 (#516) AdjNet -11.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -11.0 More → 0.214 (#517) AdjNet -11.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 69.7 More → 0.334 (#523) AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 69.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 61.1 More → 0.554 (#244) AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 61.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.509 (#346) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.528 (#325) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 94 | GP 23 More → 1042 (#208) RD 94 | GP 23

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-09 @ William & Mary - Incomplete score
2025-11-14 @ Newberry - Incomplete score
2025-11-15 @ Augusta - Incomplete score
2025-11-19 @ Coker - Incomplete score
2025-11-22 vs USC Beaufort - Incomplete score
2025-11-25 @ UNC Pembroke - Incomplete score
2025-11-29 vs Winston-Salem - Incomplete score
2025-12-03 @ Chowan - Incomplete score
2025-12-06 @ Shaw - Incomplete score
2025-12-13 vs Shorter - Incomplete score
2025-12-17 vs Mount Olive - Incomplete score
2025-12-20 @ Livingstone - Incomplete score
2025-12-31 vs USC Aiken - Incomplete score
2026-01-03 @ Young Harris - Incomplete score
2026-01-10 vs Lees-McRae - Incomplete score
2026-01-13 vs Francis Marion - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 @ Converse - Incomplete score
2026-01-19 vs North Greenville - Incomplete score
2026-01-23 @ Erskine - Incomplete score
2026-01-28 vs UNC Pembroke - Incomplete score
2026-01-30 vs Ferrum - Incomplete score
2026-02-04 @ Southern Wesleyan - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 vs King (TN) - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Layne Sleight - 21 30.2 12.9 5.1 2.0 1.7 0.2 2.1 12.3 7.3 39 1.9 8.0 35.1 34.3 72.2 -0.75 47.7 44.6
Lauren Mingo - 21 30.4 11.4 7.9 3.9 3.0 0.5 3.0 9.9 13.9 110 5.2 22.4 43.0 16.2 70.9 4.67 49.6 44.4
MaKayla Noble - 19 17.8 9.7 5.3 0.7 0.6 0.3 1.6 8.2 6.8 -3 -0.2 -1.0 49.4 27.8 68.4 0.87 53.6 51.0
Celeste Bailey - 21 32.3 8.5 3.0 2.2 1.1 0.3 1.6 8.4 5.2 54 2.6 9.8 34.5 28.3 68.9 -0.7 43.9 38.7
Leah Hampton - 16 27.6 7.6 3.2 1.4 0.9 0.1 1.5 7.7 4.0 27 1.7 9.9 34.1 25.6 80.0 -2.15 46.3 43.1
Lauren Farrell - 21 16.4 5.3 3.9 0.4 0.8 0.0 1.0 4.4 5.0 122 5.8 41.1 45.7 38.5 59.5 4.38 51.3 48.4
Cyntiah Braden - 19 17.6 4.9 3.8 0.6 0.7 0.1 1.2 6.0 3.0 84 4.4 26.0 30.7 13.2 65.5 -0.57 37.1 32.9
Dasani Williamson - 18 12.5 3.2 1.8 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.5 4.3 -0.2 -32 -1.9 -57.7 32.5 0.0 46.7 -2.06 34.1 32.5
Jahriell Murchison - 19 15.1 3.0 2.8 0.9 0.4 0.2 1.8 3.2 2.3 24 1.3 13.2 34.4 32.0 53.8 -1.76 42.7 41.0
Candice Williams - 10 8.8 2.9 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.6 1.6 3.3 -1 -0.1 -10.9 50.0 66.7 73.3 -0.48 64.2 56.2
Erica McClary - 1 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 - - - 50.0 0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Jaliyah Mitchell - 6 5.5 1.5 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.8 1.7 0.7 - - - 30.0 0.0 30.0 0.45 31.2 30.0
Tamiya Turner - 17 8.5 0.8 2.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 1.1 2.2 37 2.3 28.0 27.8 0 50.0 1.37 31.5 27.8
Kaylin McKoy - 3 4.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 8 2.7 243.0 25.0 0.0 0 - 25.0 25.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG