Barry
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 925 (#434) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 882 (#448) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 823 (#666) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -9.6 (#245) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -10.1 (#511) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.559 (#336) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.223 (#357) | NetEff -9.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.710 (#318) | AdjNet +7.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.722 (#319) | AdjNet +8.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.634 (#298) | AdjO 70.9 | AdjD 64.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.292 (#616) | AdjO 58.4 | AdjD 68.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.247 (#568) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.241 (#577) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 785 (#477) | RD 104 | GP 21 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Trevecca Nazarene | L | 46 - 54 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Christian Brothers | L | 46 - 49 |
| 2025-11-17 | vs | P.R.-Mayaguez | W | 71 - 50 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | Eckerd | L | 54 - 81 |
| 2025-11-28 | @ | USC Beaufort | L | 38 - 62 |
| 2025-11-29 | @ | Cedarville | L | 56 - 67 |
| 2025-12-01 | @ | Ave Maria | W | 80 - 72 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Nova Southeastern | L | 77 - 86 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Palm Beach Atl. | W | 69 - 55 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Embry-Riddle (FL) | L | 52 - 96 |
| 2025-12-30 | vs | Ave Maria | W | 75 - 50 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Rollins | W | 62 - 48 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Tampa | L | 53 - 79 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Lynn | L | 34 - 51 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Saint Leo | L | 86 - 91 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Florida Tech | L | 37 - 55 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Palm Beach Atl. | L | 51 - 62 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Embry-Riddle (FL) | L | 61 - 87 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Nova Southeastern | L | 56 - 108 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Lynn | L | 63 - 73 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Izzy Brenzil | - | 1 | 31.0 | 13.0 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 13.0 | -3 | -0.2 | -1.5 | 40.0 | 42.9 | 100.0 | 0.46 | 59.7 | 55.0 |
| Kendall Parker | - | 20 | 30.6 | 10.7 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 9.4 | 4.2 | -57 | -3.2 | -11.3 | 39.7 | 33.7 | 81.0 | -0.91 | 51.3 | 47.4 |
| Isabella Brenzil | - | 15 | 30.3 | 9.8 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 9.3 | 6.7 | -3 | -0.2 | -1.5 | 35.3 | 31.2 | 77.4 | 0.46 | 48.2 | 44.2 |
| Jazz Cook | - | 19 | 20.3 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 6.1 | 8.1 | 7 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 62.6 | 0 | 41.2 | 1.28 | 60.8 | 62.6 |
| Kornelia Ignerska | - | 20 | 33.6 | 8.2 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 8.8 | 3.1 | -86 | -4.3 | -14.4 | 32.4 | 29.8 | 52.0 | -1.69 | 43.9 | 42.9 |
| Paola Pareja | - | 12 | 24.7 | 7.8 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 8.2 | 2.8 | -17 | -1.4 | -3.6 | 42.4 | 33.3 | 30.4 | 0.25 | 43.1 | 43.9 |
| Akvile Babraityte | - | 20 | 19.9 | 6.3 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 | -95 | -5.3 | -32.8 | 46.0 | 32.4 | 69.7 | -0.0 | 55.0 | 51.5 |
| Jameria Robinson | - | 19 | 24.1 | 4.8 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 3.1 | -103 | -6.1 | -32.3 | 29.7 | 22.4 | 63.6 | -4.07 | 39.8 | 35.1 |
| Andreonia Doe | - | 20 | 19.9 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 4.4 | -67 | -3.7 | -22.9 | 37.7 | 0 | 50.0 | -2.64 | 39.7 | 37.7 |
| Paloma Bioque | - | 16 | 11.6 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.1 | -1.5 | -105 | -7.0 | -94.7 | 27.3 | 19.2 | 30.0 | -2.29 | 31.2 | 31.1 |
| Janina Vergara Virgil | - | 13 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.2 | -18 | -1.5 | -23.9 | 26.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 0.24 | 47.3 | 26.7 |
| Sydney Williams | - | 3 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 124 | 5.6 | 27.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 2.14 | 36.2 | 0.0 |
| Jillian Paulson | - | 5 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Treazure Diggins | - | 2 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Zaaliyah Kailahi-Fulu | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Janina Vergara Vergi | - | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG