Auburn
2012 Team Stats (3 games)
62.7
PPG
64.5
Opp
-1.6
Margin
40.4%
FG%
26.5%
3P%
69.5%
FT%
31.0
RPG
10.7
APG
9.0
TO
73.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1755 (#19) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1485 (#59) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +35.9 (#30) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.270 (#91) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.129 (#157) | NetEff -17.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.425 (#70) | AdjNet -2.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.428 (#70) | AdjNet -2.5 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F. Sullivan
|
G | 29 | 31.7 | 12.4 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 37.6 | 31.7 | 68.3 | - | 107.5 | 46.8 |
K. Gabriel
|
F | 29 | 31.2 | 11.9 | 7.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 5.4 | 16.2 | - | - | - | 41.4 | 36.5 | 87.0 | - | 103.5 | 48.7 |
V. Ward
|
G | 24 | 29.0 | 9.6 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 10.8 | - | - | - | 24.8 | 17.5 | 65.8 | - | 78.5 | 27.9 |
C. Denson
|
G | 28 | 23.1 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 7.2 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 40.8 | 32.0 | 65.2 | 0.39 | 90.9 | 44.2 |
R. Chubb
|
C | 29 | 24.2 | 8.3 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 9.4 | - | - | - | 46.6 | 0.0 | 62.1 | - | 94.0 | 46.6 |
J. Langford
|
G | 13 | 13.4 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 51.7 | 25.0 | 83.3 | - | 115.4 | 55.2 |
A. Payne
|
F | 18 | 19.7 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 39.3 | 33.3 | 81.8 | - | 123.3 | 41.1 |
J. Wallace
|
G | 29 | 17.9 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 5.1 | - | - | - | 39.5 | 25.0 | 33.3 | - | 110.9 | 40.8 |
A. Forbes
|
F | 27 | 14.4 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 83.4 | 50.0 |
J. Drum
|
F | 1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Johnson
|
F | 18 | 11.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 24 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 20.7 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 1.13 | 56.0 | 24.1 |
W. Kouassi
|
C | 23 | 10.7 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 53.3 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 107.7 | 53.3 |
T. Neysmith
|
G | 8 | 10.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 0.0 |
D. Spencer
|
G | 3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
T.J. Rice
|
- | 3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. McAfee
|
- | 3 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | -0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG