Army - 2026-2027 | Sports Data

2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)

74.8

PPG

49.5

Opp

+25.3

Margin

44.9%

FG%

38.6%

3P%

76.8%

FT%

41.0

RPG

15.0

APG

13.3

TO

68.8

Est. poss./game

70.0

Adj PPG

61.8

Adj Opp PPG

#74

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 1178 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1069, returning +167, transfers -58, freshmen +0 More →	1218 (#70)	Preseason prior 1178 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1069, returning +167, transfers -58, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More →	1142 (#70)	HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More →	1140 (#71)	HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More →	+14.2 (#62)	HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More →	+14.2 (#63)	HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.830 (#87)	-
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +12.7 More →	0.731 (#87)	AdjNet +12.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +12.1 More →	0.736 (#88)	AdjNet +12.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 70.0 \| AdjD 61.8 More →	0.701 (#74)	AdjO 70.0 \| AdjD 61.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 70.0 \| AdjD 62.0 More →	0.698 (#75)	AdjO 70.0 \| AdjD 62.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.750 (#72)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.750 (#72)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 193 \| GP 2 More →	1152 (#75)	RD 193 \| GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More →	0.764 (#75)	Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2026-11-02	vs	St. Thomas Aquinas Spartans	W	81 - 28
2026-11-05	@	Brown Bears	W	81 - 56
2026-11-11	vs	George Mason Patriots	W	80 - 75
2026-11-14	vs	St. Thomas Tommies	W	57 - 39
2026-11-17	@	Massachusetts Minutewomen	-	Preview
2026-11-19	@	Siena Saints	-	Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Show Alumni If everyone stayed four years

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions and box-score rates; an unlisted position is inferred from those rates, and missing rates are treated as zero. Legend numbers are each player's share of recorded roster minutes, scaled to five players' regulation minutes; they can differ from minutes per game in the roster below, especially when players miss games or coverage is incomplete. Each position column totals one regulation game's minutes. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Kya Smith	F	4	28.2	17.2	9.0	2.8	1.2	0.2	2.2	11.2	17.0	48	3	16.0	23.6	51.1	0.0	88.5	2.23	61.1	51.1
Camryn Tade	G	4	31.2	15.2	4.8	2.5	1.5	0.5	1.0	10.8	12.8	57	3	19.0	24.3	58.1	66.7	42.9	2.58	66.2	67.4
Fiona Hastick	G	4	26.5	9.5	5.0	2.0	0.5	0.0	1.0	7.8	8.2	75	3	25.0	37.3	48.4	46.7	50.0	2.6	59.6	59.7
Reganne Reardon	F	4	21.0	9.5	3.2	1.2	0.2	0.0	1.2	8.5	4.5	33	3	11.0	21.1	44.1	33.3	75.0	0.16	50.6	47.1
Audrey Annee	G	4	16.2	9.2	1.8	0.2	0.8	0.0	0.5	6.2	5.2	48	3	16.0	38.5	48.0	43.5	75.0	0.96	69.1	68.0
Brooke Wilson	G	4	25.0	6.5	4.2	3.2	1.5	0.2	2.2	4.2	9.2	-	-	-	-	41.2	33.3	90.0	-	60.7	50.0
Kelly Cramer	G	1	10.0	4.0	3.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	4.0	5.0	5	1	5.0	20.0	50.0	0.0	0	-1.53	50.0	50.0
Taylor Wilson	G	4	26.2	2.8	4.8	1.8	0.8	0.5	1.8	5.2	3.5	49	3	16.3	26.1	14.3	25.0	75.0	1.06	24.2	19.0
Jane Preston	F	3	3.7	1.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	1.0	6	2	3.0	29.2	100.0	100.0	0	-1.58	150.0	150.0
Landry Sherrer	G	2	5.5	1.0	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.5	0.0	5	1	5.0	20.0	33.3	0.0	0.0	-1.32	25.8	33.3
Daniela Maletsky	G	2	6.5	1.0	1.0	0.0	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.0	2.5	9	2	4.5	32.6	0	0	100.0	0.05	113.6	0
Julia Sedora	G	3	6.0	1.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	1.7	1.3	-1.7	1	2	0.5	3.4	25.0	25.0	0	-1.24	37.5	37.5
Sam Tillson	F	4	9.2	0.8	0.8	0.2	0.2	0.2	1.0	0.8	0.5	16	3	5.3	23.3	0.0	0.0	75.0	0.04	31.5	0.0
Stella Chartrand	G	3	4.7	0.7	1.3	0.7	0.7	0.0	0.0	0.7	2.7	-5	2	-2.5	-17.8	50.0	0	0	-4.58	50.0	50.0
Addison Ainsworth	F	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nakia Ollivierre	G	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Jane Rape	G	1	3.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	1	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	-0.78	0	0
Allie Swindell	F	1	6.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	-1.0	6	1	6.0	42.0	0.0	0.0	0	-0.13	0.0	0.0
Lilly Thoman	G	1	4.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	-2.0	-1	1	-1.0	-9.3	0.0	0.0	0	-1.07	0.0	0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

236 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Camryn TadeKya SmithFiona HastickAudrey AnneeReganne ReardonBrooke WilsonJulia Sedora

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	34-59	57.6	68	Kya Smith 41% (28 pts)	Camryn Tade 24% (16 pts)	Kya Smith 40% (10 misses)	Camryn Tade 20% (5 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	29-60	48.3	58	Kya Smith 28% (16 pts)	Reganne Reardon 28% (16 pts)	Reganne Reardon 29% (9 misses)	Taylor Wilson 26% (8 misses)
Mid-range left	3-8	37.5	6	Camryn Tade 33% (2 pts)	Fiona Hastick 33% (2 pts)	Fiona Hastick 40% (2 misses)	Kya Smith 40% (2 misses)
Mid-range center	3-9	33.3	6	Camryn Tade 100% (6 pts)	-	Camryn Tade 33% (2 misses)	Reganne Reardon 33% (2 misses)
Mid-range right	3-12	25.0	6	Camryn Tade 33% (2 pts)	Fiona Hastick 33% (2 pts)	Camryn Tade 33% (3 misses)	Fiona Hastick 22% (2 misses)
Left corner 3	4-8	50.0	12	Audrey Annee 25% (3 pts)	Brooke Wilson 25% (3 pts)	Audrey Annee 25% (1 misses)	Camryn Tade 25% (1 misses)
Right corner 3	1-3	33.3	3	Audrey Annee 100% (3 pts)	-	Audrey Annee 50% (1 misses)	Landry Sherrer 50% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left	9-21	42.9	27	Camryn Tade 22% (6 pts)	Fiona Hastick 22% (6 pts)	Julia Sedora 25% (3 misses)	Audrey Annee 17% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 center	5-17	29.4	15	Audrey Annee 40% (6 pts)	Fiona Hastick 40% (6 pts)	Brooke Wilson 25% (3 misses)	Reganne Reardon 25% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 right	15-39	38.5	45	Audrey Annee 33% (15 pts)	Camryn Tade 27% (12 pts)	Audrey Annee 33% (8 misses)	Fiona Hastick 25% (6 misses)