🐻⬇️🏀

Arkansas Tech

Also known as: Arkansas Tech
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1269 (#22) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1275 (#20) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1172 (#29) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More → +20.7 (#44) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +23.0 (#69) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.597 (#326) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +17.9 More → 0.895 (#141) NetEff +17.9
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -75.6 More → 0.000 (#497) NetEff -75.6
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +18.7 More → 0.896 (#209) AdjNet +18.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +19.4 More → 0.908 (#205) AdjNet +19.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 74.3 | AdjD 61.1 More → 0.769 (#199) AdjO 74.3 | AdjD 61.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 80.4 | AdjD 66.8 More → 0.774 (#41) AdjO 80.4 | AdjD 66.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.889 (#38) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.878 (#35) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 107 | GP 19 More → 1319 (#11) RD 107 | GP 19

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-14 vs Tex. A&M Int'l - Incomplete score
2025-11-17 vs Champion Chris. - Incomplete score
2025-11-19 @ Ark.-Fort Smith - Incomplete score
2025-11-25 vs Delta St. - Incomplete score
2025-12-04 vs Northwestern Okla. - Incomplete score
2025-12-06 vs Southwestern Okla. - Incomplete score
2025-12-09 vs Southern Ark. - Incomplete score
2025-12-11 @ Henderson St. - Incomplete score
2025-12-15 vs Southern Ark. - Incomplete score
2026-01-03 vs Ouachita Baptist - Incomplete score
2026-01-10 @ Southern Nazarene - Incomplete score
2026-01-15 vs East Central - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 vs Southeastern Okla. - Incomplete score
2026-01-22 vs Harding - Incomplete score
2026-01-29 @ Southwestern Okla. - Incomplete score
2026-01-31 @ Northwestern Okla. - Incomplete score
2026-02-05 vs Southern Nazarene - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 vs Okla. Baptist - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Logan Young - 17 28.3 16.6 4.8 0.8 1.9 0.9 1.1 10.6 13.2 146 7.7 30.1 54.1 34.6 88.5 3.22 64.3 56.6
AbbiGrace Cunningham - 17 21.5 11.5 5.4 1.2 0.2 0.6 1.7 8.5 8.6 16 0.8 4.9 44.8 37.9 86.3 -3.56 58.5 52.4
Perina Leime - 15 22.1 10.5 3.3 1.3 1.3 0.2 1.8 8.9 5.8 67 3.9 34.3 46.3 38.0 82.4 0.76 55.5 53.4
Dessie McCarty - 17 16.4 8.9 6.6 1.4 1.1 0.3 1.8 7.4 9.2 117 6.2 57.6 42.4 14.8 77.8 4.44 51.1 44.0
Jadah Pickens - 17 19.5 7.6 2.4 2.0 1.2 0.2 1.3 5.4 6.6 114 6.0 36.3 50.5 22.2 66.0 3.09 57.1 52.7
Shalyn Lyle - 17 25.6 7.4 3.2 3.1 1.4 0.4 2.4 6.3 6.7 136 7.2 36.0 37.4 29.7 81.4 4.18 50.0 42.5
Hayleigh Wyrick - 17 15.9 6.3 1.9 1.1 0.7 0.1 1.2 5.5 3.4 114 6.0 37.5 40.9 47.4 76.5 2.64 53.2 50.5
Madelyn Atkins - 17 8.4 3.6 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.2 1.9 11 0.6 7.6 38.2 34.9 44.4 -1.21 51.7 51.8
Jaiden Smith - 17 15.3 3.5 1.8 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.5 3.1 3.1 7 0.4 3.7 32.1 26.2 83.3 -2.21 49.2 42.5
ClaraGrace Prater - 17 13.9 3.5 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 1.0 2.7 4.1 59 3.1 21.9 39.1 44.4 80.0 0.71 54.7 47.8
Mackenzie Heeke - 13 7.0 2.0 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.5 1.3 2.0 24 1.7 23.7 52.9 0.0 53.3 -0.1 55.1 52.9
Maya Bujak - 6 5.5 2.0 1.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5 1.8 2.2 23 3.3 64.9 36.4 14.3 75.0 0.66 47.0 40.9
Jessie Lyle - 11 5.2 1.9 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.5 2.1 0.5 41 3.4 92.2 39.1 27.3 0.0 2.41 44.8 45.7
Marleigh Sellers - 17 8.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.5 1.4 1.4 12 0.6 8.7 29.2 0.0 25.0 -1.24 29.1 29.2

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG