Arizona
2010 Team Stats (2 games)
57.0
PPG
77.5
Opp
-20.5
Margin
38.2%
FG%
38.2%
3P%
60.7%
FT%
24.0
RPG
8.5
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
68.2
Adj PPG
59.4
Adj Opp PPG
#81
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2009-2010
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 905 (#245) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1054 (#137) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 972 (#200) | HCA +89 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +10.4 (#74) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +11.9 (#63) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.452 (#184) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.836 (#84) | AdjNet +14.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.843 (#84) | AdjNet +14.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.690 (#81) | AdjO 68.2 | AdjD 59.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.605 (#93) | AdjO 64.6 | AdjD 59.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.668 (#96) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.652 (#102) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1004 (#159) | RD 133 | GP 31 |
2010 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-11-14 | @ | Iona Gaels | W | 75 - 70 |
| 2009-11-15 | vs | Miami (OH) RedHawks | W | 91 - 67 |
| 2009-11-21 | @ | San Diego State Aztecs | L | 38 - 57 |
| 2009-11-23 | vs | Ole Miss Rebels | W | 65 - 59 |
| 2009-11-27 | @ | San Diego Toreros | W | 65 - 55 |
| 2009-12-04 | vs | Nevada Wolf Pack | W | 84 - 57 |
| 2009-12-09 | vs | New Mexico Lobos | L | 61 - 81 |
| 2009-12-20 | @ | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | L | 48 - 70 |
| 2009-12-23 | @ | UC Riverside Highlanders | L | 53 - 65 |
| 2009-12-29 | vs | Alabama A&M Bulldogs | W | 86 - 50 |
| 2010-01-01 | vs | UCLA Bruins | L | 58 - 67 |
| 2010-01-03 | vs | USC Trojans | L | 78 - 81 |
| 2010-01-07 | @ | Washington State Cougars | W | 67 - 60 |
| 2010-01-09 | @ | Washington Huskies | L | 59 - 69 |
| 2010-01-14 | vs | Oregon State Beavers | W | 62 - 53 |
| 2010-01-16 | vs | Oregon Ducks | W | 119 - 112 |
| 2010-01-24 | vs | Arizona State Sun Devils | L | 67 - 73 |
| 2010-01-28 | @ | California Golden Bears | L | 53 - 73 |
| 2010-01-30 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 62 - 83 |
| 2010-02-04 | vs | Washington State Cougars | W | 73 - 66 |
| 2010-02-06 | vs | Washington Huskies | W | 80 - 50 |
| 2010-02-11 | @ | Oregon Ducks | L | 74 - 92 |
| 2010-02-13 | @ | Oregon State Beavers | W | 60 - 55 |
| 2010-02-16 | vs | Cal State Northridge Matadors | W | 73 - 50 |
| 2010-02-20 | @ | Arizona State Sun Devils | L | 49 - 57 |
| 2010-02-25 | vs | California Golden Bears | L | 52 - 58 |
| 2010-02-27 | vs | Stanford Cardinal | L | 48 - 75 |
| 2010-03-04 | @ | USC Trojans | L | 53 - 55 |
| 2010-03-06 | @ | UCLA Bruins | L | 61 - 70 |
| 2010-03-11 | vs | Washington State Cougars | W | 62 - 60 |
| 2010-03-12 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 52 - 72 |
2010 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Lucet
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 4.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 12.3 | 5.3 | -66 | 22 | -3.0 | -4.0 | 43.2 | 28.6 | 66.7 | -1.15 | 49.7 | 45.9 |
D. Whyte
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 13.7 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 16.0 | 2.0 | -44 | 22 | -2.0 | -2.6 | 35.4 | 23.8 | 50.0 | 3.44 | 41.2 | 40.6 |
I. Ibekwe
|
F | 3 | 0.0 | 12.7 | 11.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 10.7 | 11.3 | -17 | 22 | -0.8 | -1.0 | 53.1 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 5.25 | 51.0 | 53.1 |
K. Hyland
|
F | 1 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | -83 | 22 | -3.8 | -6.1 | 22.2 | 50.0 | 100.0 | -0.24 | 41.8 | 27.8 |
A. Frazier
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | -61 | 22 | -2.8 | -4.3 | 45.5 | 66.7 | 0 | -1.91 | 63.6 | 63.6 |
B. Jackson
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.5 | 0.5 | -4 | 22 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 23.1 | 22.2 | 50.0 | 1.72 | 32.4 | 30.8 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG