Arizona Wildcats
2024 Team Stats (14 games)
66.0
PPG
73.4
Opp
-7.4
Margin
41.4%
FG%
32.0%
3P%
76.0%
FT%
28.4
RPG
13.4
APG
15.1
TO
81.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 976 (#227) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1117 (#130) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +26.8 (#93) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.452 (#208) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.315 (#66) | AdjNet -6.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.309 (#67) | AdjNet -7.0 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | @ | Ole Miss Rebels | L | 47 - 56 |
| 2023-12-13 | vs | Texas Longhorns | L | 75 - 88 |
| 2023-12-20 | vs | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 69 - 81 |
| 2024-01-05 | vs | Colorado Buffaloes | L | 74 - 75 |
| 2024-01-07 | vs | Utah Utes | W | 71 - 70 |
| 2024-01-28 | vs | Stanford Cardinal | L | 64 - 96 |
| 2024-02-09 | @ | UCLA Bruins | L | 58 - 66 |
| 2024-02-12 | @ | USC Trojans | L | 64 - 81 |
| 2024-02-23 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | W | 68 - 61 |
| 2024-02-29 | vs | USC Trojans | L | 93 - 95 |
| 2024-03-02 | vs | UCLA Bruins | L | 41 - 61 |
| 2024-03-07 | @ | USC Trojans | L | 62 - 65 |
| 2024-03-21 | @ | Auburn Tigers | W | 69 - 59 |
| 2024-03-23 | @ | Syracuse Orange | L | 69 - 74 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Gilbert
|
G | 7 | 30.1 | 16.4 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 16.3 | 5.1 | 7 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 36.8 | 38.1 | 82.1 | 0.02 | 45.5 | 40.4 |
H. Pueyo
|
G | 14 | 38.6 | 12.1 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 9.4 | 12.5 | 14 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 51.9 | 47.7 | 75.0 | 0.38 | 61.2 | 59.9 |
M. Nnaji
|
F | 1 | 28.0 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 46.6 | 41.7 |
S. Kourouma
|
F | 4 | 21.5 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 7.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 61.1 | - | 57.1 | 53.6 |
J. Williams
|
G | 14 | 31.1 | 9.6 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 9.1 | 3.3 | 41 | 3.7 | 5.6 | 31.5 | 25.0 | 82.0 | 0.33 | 45.0 | 36.6 |
S. Jones
|
G | 13 | 28.2 | 9.2 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 45.8 | 22.2 | 81.2 | 0.28 | 57.1 | 48.2 |
E. Martinez
|
F | 14 | 28.2 | 8.6 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 7.8 | 7.5 | -3 | -0.3 | -0.4 | 39.4 | 26.9 | 75.7 | 0.25 | 48.3 | 42.7 |
B. Cunningham
|
F | 14 | 21.1 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 48.4 | 0 | 52.6 | 0.26 | 49.3 | 48.4 |
C. Blakely
|
G | 14 | 16.9 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 3.1 | -15 | -1.7 | -2.8 | 37.1 | 30.0 | 78.3 | 0.14 | 45.6 | 39.3 |
I. Beh
|
F | 12 | 23.2 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 2.7 | -6 | -0.7 | -0.9 | 35.3 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.09 | 38.2 | 35.3 |
B. Rhodes
|
F | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -15 | -3.0 | -5.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG