Anderson (SC)
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1008 (#258) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1005 (#280) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 995 (#426) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +1.5 (#154) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +3.3 (#310) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.721 (#281) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.566 (#257) | NetEff +2.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.808 (#270) | AdjNet +12.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.813 (#274) | AdjNet +12.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.681 (#267) | AdjO 74.1 | AdjD 65.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.560 (#227) | AdjO 66.7 | AdjD 64.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.541 (#319) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.551 (#303) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1014 (#229) | RD 94 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Flagler | L | 66 - 72 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Clayton St. | W | 88 - 66 |
| 2025-11-19 | @ | Belmont Abbey | W | 71 - 68 |
| 2025-11-29 | @ | Emory & Henry | L | 73 - 84 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Mars Hill | W | 63 - 47 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Carson-Newman | L | 66 - 91 |
| 2025-12-17 | @ | Newberry | L | 49 - 62 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Lincoln Memorial | L | 62 - 72 |
| 2025-12-31 | @ | Ga. Southwestern | W | 80 - 73 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Wingate | L | 58 - 63 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Tusculum | W | 81 - 38 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Catawba | W | 67 - 57 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | UVA Wise | L | 66 - 69 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Lenoir-Rhyne | L | 72 - 81 |
| 2026-01-23 | vs | Emory & Henry | W | 88 - 66 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Wingate | L | 68 - 69 |
| 2026-01-30 | @ | Mars Hill | W | 81 - 68 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Newberry | W | 79 - 52 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Carson-Newman | W | 84 - 76 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ciara Harris | - | 19 | 31.0 | 17.6 | 5.4 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 14.3 | 10.4 | 35 | 1.8 | 8.3 | 37.9 | 29.4 | 89.8 | 2.69 | 52.4 | 43.8 |
| Ashley Hill | - | 18 | 26.8 | 10.9 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 9.1 | 8.6 | 15 | 0.8 | 4.4 | 48.8 | 33.3 | 80.0 | -0.53 | 55.6 | 52.7 |
| Ashlyn Sheridan | - | 18 | 28.0 | 9.0 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 8.5 | 6.3 | -30 | -1.6 | -12.3 | 39.9 | 35.8 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 50.6 | 47.7 |
| Jaida Brooks | - | 9 | 25.0 | 9.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 8.3 | 3.7 | 48 | 5.3 | 14.2 | 37.3 | 40.9 | 80.0 | 1.06 | 48.3 | 43.3 |
| Kyla Cain | - | 19 | 23.2 | 8.6 | 5.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 7.7 | 8.5 | 17 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 45.9 | 20.0 | 79.4 | -0.68 | 50.6 | 46.6 |
| Peytyn Oliver | - | 10 | 29.4 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 9.0 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 26.7 | 24.1 | 75.0 | - | 37.6 | 33.9 |
| Rose Gravel | - | 10 | 19.7 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 6.4 | 8.0 | -16 | -1.8 | -154.2 | 37.5 | 0.0 | 66.7 | -1.72 | 41.1 | 37.5 |
| Khiara Flugence | - | 14 | 13.3 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 27 | 1.8 | 21.9 | 65.2 | 0 | 35.7 | 0.38 | 62.3 | 65.2 |
| Jessica Cooper | - | 15 | 8.5 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 7 | 0.4 | 8.9 | 37.3 | 0.0 | 82.6 | 1.48 | 45.6 | 37.3 |
| Alana Eakle | - | 16 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 30 | 2.0 | 25.7 | 51.4 | 53.3 | 66.7 | 2.64 | 63.1 | 62.2 |
| Jayla Cal | - | 19 | 16.6 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 3.9 | 1.1 | -8 | -0.4 | -4.1 | 28.4 | 22.2 | 70.0 | -2.35 | 33.8 | 31.1 |
| LaKeeyah Barnes | - | 7 | 8.0 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 30.4 | 27.3 |
| Amilya Taft | - | 10 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.3 | -21 | -2.1 | -58.3 | 46.2 | 0 | 61.5 | -1.47 | 53.4 | 46.2 |
| Kyia Barrett | - | 16 | 9.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 43 | 2.5 | 49.9 | 23.5 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.33 | 27.6 | 27.9 |
| Ashlynn Bleisath | - | 11 | 6.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | -6 | -0.7 | -9.8 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.29 | 29.1 | 16.7 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG