Anderson (SC)
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1160 (#16) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1318 (#9) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1242 (#4) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.6 (#5) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +20.0 (#57) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.814 (#153) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 1.000 (#6) | NetEff +93.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.878 (#160) | AdjNet +17.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.898 (#141) | AdjNet +18.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.785 (#134) | AdjO 83.5 | AdjD 69.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.806 (#17) | AdjO 77.8 | AdjD 62.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.906 (#8) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.898 (#5) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1437 (#2) | RD 108 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Erskine | W | 101 - 61 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Emmanuel (GA) | W | 89 - 71 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Eckerd | W | 78 - 64 |
| 2025-11-20 | @ | Tampa | W | 93 - 67 |
| 2025-11-24 | vs | Bob Jones | W | 133 - 74 |
| 2025-11-29 | @ | Emory & Henry | W | 97 - 46 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Mars Hill | W | 88 - 69 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Carson-Newman | W | 94 - 80 |
| 2025-12-17 | @ | Newberry | W | 87 - 63 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Lincoln Memorial | W | 78 - 55 |
| 2025-12-31 | @ | Clayton St. | W | 73 - 62 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Wingate | W | 73 - 60 |
| 2026-01-07 | vs | Coker | W | 88 - 55 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Tusculum | W | 86 - 65 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Catawba | W | 97 - 74 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | UVA Wise | L | 67 - 73 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Lenoir-Rhyne | W | 102 - 96 |
| 2026-01-23 | vs | Emory & Henry | W | 61 - 54 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Wingate | W | 65 - 60 |
| 2026-01-30 | @ | Mars Hill | W | 75 - 66 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Newberry | W | 73 - 58 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Carson-Newman | W | 60 - 52 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rashawn Inglemon | - | 22 | 31.0 | 16.5 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 11.8 | 11.1 | 198 | 9.0 | 46.7 | 46.7 | 46.2 | 87.2 | 2.53 | 64.7 | 62.0 |
| Osmar Garcia | - | 22 | 26.2 | 16.4 | 7.0 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 9.1 | 16.7 | 114 | 5.2 | 27.5 | 67.5 | 0 | 72.8 | 0.79 | 70.8 | 67.5 |
| Kadyn Dawkins | - | 22 | 23.8 | 12.1 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 8.2 | 8.5 | 146 | 6.6 | 36.6 | 49.2 | 48.0 | 78.0 | -0.26 | 65.5 | 62.7 |
| Andre Wright Jr. | - | 22 | 30.2 | 8.7 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 7.9 | 11.4 | 208 | 9.5 | 41.3 | 39.3 | 27.0 | 70.4 | 2.21 | 48.5 | 44.2 |
| Caleb McAbee | - | 22 | 23.6 | 8.2 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.6 | 5.9 | 98 | 4.7 | 29.0 | 46.2 | 40.6 | 100.0 | -1.78 | 61.3 | 60.3 |
| Malachi Reeves | - | 22 | 26.9 | 7.3 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 7.0 | 5.7 | 179 | 8.5 | 41.1 | 38.1 | 24.4 | 62.9 | 2.27 | 46.9 | 44.5 |
| Sam Perez | - | 2 | 24.8 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 13.5 | 26 | 5.2 | 40.9 | 36.4 | 22.2 | 100.0 | 0.07 | 54.9 | 45.5 |
| Dallas Jones | - | 21 | 14.3 | 6.9 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 65 | 3.2 | 44.9 | 43.4 | 38.6 | 71.4 | -0.13 | 55.1 | 50.9 |
| Sentinel Moore | - | 21 | 10.9 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 5.9 | 24 | 1.2 | 15.0 | 73.6 | 0.0 | 68.2 | -1.09 | 74.2 | 73.6 |
| Ian Blue | - | 4 | 15.3 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 54 | 18.0 | 432.0 | 31.8 | 14.3 | 50.0 | 0.5 | 37.2 | 36.4 |
| James Repass | - | 19 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2 | 0.1 | 5.9 | 60.0 | 0 | 40.0 | -1.17 | 59.1 | 60.0 |
| Jemeh Jones | - | 8 | 6.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | -34 | -4.9 | -74.2 | 43.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -2.22 | 47.4 | 43.8 |
| Cason Collins | - | 11 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | -17 | -1.7 | -103.3 | 11.1 | 14.3 | 0 | -0.63 | 16.7 | 16.7 |
| Cal Godfrey | - | 10 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | -26 | -2.9 | -369.2 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | -0.38 | 30.7 | 37.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG