American Int'l
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 996 (#166) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 977 (#187) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +2.9 (#174) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.632 (#312) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.828 (#102) | NetEff +12.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.531 (#393) | AdjNet +1.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.543 (#394) | AdjNet +1.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.541 (#366) | AdjO 68.0 | AdjD 66.2 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | D'Youville | W | 57 - 51 |
| 2024-11-09 | @ | St. Thomas Aquinas | W | 75 - 64 |
| 2024-11-13 | vs | Saint Anselm | L | 72 - 74 |
| 2024-11-17 | vs | Molloy | W | 69 - 62 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Bridgeport | W | 70 - 48 |
| 2024-11-26 | @ | Bentley | L | 41 - 59 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Pace | L | 52 - 54 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | New Haven | L | 71 - 79 |
| 2024-12-09 | @ | Queens (NY) | W | 72 - 50 |
| 2024-12-11 | @ | Post | W | 78 - 59 |
| 2024-12-20 | @ | Wilmington (DE) | W | 89 - 40 |
| 2024-12-21 | @ | Goldey-Beacom | L | 67 - 75 |
| 2025-01-02 | vs | Saint Michael's | W | 56 - 55 |
| 2025-01-05 | @ | Franklin Pierce | L | 61 - 65 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Adelphi | W | 61 - 47 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Southern Conn. St. | L | 85 - 88 |
| 2025-01-14 | vs | Assumption | L | 52 - 53 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Southern N.H. | W | 75 - 68 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Pace | L | 51 - 58 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Saint Anselm | L | 55 - 62 |
| 2025-01-28 | @ | Saint Michael's | L | 66 - 74 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Adelphi | L | 50 - 53 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | New Haven | W | 70 - 56 |
| 2025-02-11 | @ | Southern Conn. St. | L | 60 - 78 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Southern N.H. | W | 88 - 76 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Assumption | L | 36 - 59 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Bentley | L | 65 - 70 |
| 2025-02-25 | vs | Franklin Pierce | W | 74 - 56 |
| 2025-02-28 | @ | Adelphi | L | 28 - 52 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruzgar christina Boyle | - | 4 | 31.0 | 20.8 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 16.8 | 8.5 | -13 | -0.3 | -0.3 | 44.8 | 40.0 | 81.8 | 0.24 | 57.8 | 55.2 |
| Chelsea Reeves | - | 29 | 30.9 | 15.0 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 11.3 | 10.0 | 38 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 42.4 | 36.0 | 73.7 | 0.37 | 54.1 | 47.3 |
| Keyvanna Bennett | - | 29 | 26.4 | 10.3 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 11.2 | 8.2 | 17 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 34.5 | 0.0 | 55.6 | -0.18 | 38.9 | 34.5 |
| Ahliya Phillips | - | 29 | 20.3 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 3.6 | 37 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 45.1 | 21.1 | 64.7 | 0.34 | 50.3 | 47.9 |
| Peyton Grant | - | 29 | 18.5 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 5.6 | 1.3 | -1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 31.5 | 32.1 | 87.5 | -0.14 | 45.9 | 44.8 |
| Eden Monka | - | 27 | 17.3 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 5.0 | 3.9 | -7 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 36.3 | 0.0 | 60.8 | -0.38 | 41.0 | 36.3 |
| Ruzgar christina Boy | - | 1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Rhaymi Porter | - | 28 | 27.7 | 3.6 | 9.0 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 12.6 | 18 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 36.6 | 20.0 | 44.8 | 0.23 | 39.9 | 37.1 |
| Sarai Gurley | - | 29 | 11.9 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 31.9 | 26.5 | 58.8 | -0.15 | 41.1 | 39.0 |
| Heaven Morris | - | 28 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 34 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 29.0 | 0.0 | 42.9 | 0.61 | 33.5 | 29.0 |
| Alicia Aznar chamorro | - | 3 | 9.3 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | -33 | -1.1 | -4.4 | 11.1 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.58 | 9.3 | 11.1 |
| Jasmine Love | - | 25 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 10 | 1.1 | 7.2 | 75.0 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.13 | 60.8 | 75.0 |
| Jada Bryant | - | 25 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 25 | 1.3 | 9.8 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Nevaeh Graham | - | 25 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 14.8 | 0.0 |
| Madison Lopez | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -27 | -3.9 | -6.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.27 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordyn Robinson | - | 10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -34 | -2.1 | -5.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 |
| Tia-Marie Martinez | - | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG