๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Allen

Also known as: Allen
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1115 (#89) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1099 (#111) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More โ†’ 1079 (#76) HCA +62 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.6 More โ†’ +5.4 (#158) HCA +2.6
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More โ†’ +7.3 (#128) HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.845 (#47) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +5.8 More โ†’ 0.691 (#219) NetEff +5.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +9.1 More โ†’ 0.741 (#139) AdjNet +9.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +9.5 More โ†’ 0.752 (#137) AdjNet +9.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 73.4 | AdjD 67.6 More โ†’ 0.630 (#137) AdjO 73.4 | AdjD 67.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 73.8 | AdjD 66.5 More โ†’ 0.661 (#62) AdjO 73.8 | AdjD 66.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.678 (#124) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.684 (#117) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 150 | GP 24 More โ†’ 1135 (#80) RD 150 | GP 24

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-20 @ Kentucky St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-22 @ Central St. (OH) - Incomplete score
2025-11-25 vs Fort Valley St. - Incomplete score
2025-12-01 @ Charleston So. L 62 - 83
2025-12-04 vs Lane - Incomplete score
2025-12-06 vs LeMoyne-Owen - Incomplete score
2025-12-11 @ Tuskegee - Incomplete score
2025-12-13 @ Miles - Incomplete score
2025-12-17 vs Albany St. (GA) - Incomplete score
2025-12-18 vs Lander - Incomplete score
2025-12-19 vs Spring Hill - Incomplete score
2026-01-03 @ Fort Valley St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-05 @ Clark Atlanta - Incomplete score
2026-01-14 vs Edward Waters - Incomplete score
2026-01-19 @ Savannah St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-19 vs Benedict - Incomplete score
2026-01-22 vs Kentucky St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-24 vs Central St. (OH) - Incomplete score
2026-02-05 vs Tuskegee W 69 - 56
2026-02-07 vs Miles L 61 - 75
2026-02-14 @ Benedict L 66 - 77
2026-02-16 vs Savannah St. W 84 - 71
2026-02-19 @ Albany St. (GA) W 80 - 75
2026-02-21 @ Spring Hill W 75 - 59
2026-02-25 @ LeMoyne-Owen W 96 - 60
2026-02-26 @ Lane L 64 - 72
2026-02-28 vs Spring Hill W 95 - 41

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

Each player's share of the team's minutes per game (season minutes over the roster's), placed by position, so every column is one game's minutes. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Peighton Jambor - 23 25.4 14.4 6.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 2.6 11.7 10.3 64 16 4.0 6.3 46.8 20.0 78.5 0.94 53.4 48.0
Eboni Clay - 26 29.2 11.1 2.5 2.0 1.7 0.0 2.8 9.1 5.6 53 19 2.8 4.0 43.2 34.4 88.1 -2.82 55.2 50.2
Morgan Smith - 21 16.3 10.3 3.9 1.4 2.5 0.1 2.4 8.6 7.2 73 16 4.6 11.2 47.5 32.3 71.4 0.31 55.2 53.0
Anissa Tuitt - 14 28.0 10.1 4.4 1.0 1.3 0.5 1.1 8.0 8.2 98 12 8.2 11.6 43.8 40.4 67.7 2.59 56.5 54.0
Jasmine Norman - 26 20.7 7.4 2.2 1.7 1.4 0.3 0.7 8.0 4.3 40 19 2.1 4.5 33.3 31.5 66.7 -1.23 45.5 44.7
Destini Gooddine - 25 11.0 5.1 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.0 1.4 4.2 2.7 53 19 2.8 11.0 41.9 28.8 68.6 2.35 52.7 49.0
Amaris Ridgeway - 16 15.8 4.9 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.2 3.3 4.2 1.3 -33 10 -3.3 -10.5 40.3 16.7 62.5 -4.09 48.1 43.3
Kassadi King - 25 18.0 4.7 4.6 0.8 0.8 0.3 1.6 4.3 5.2 41 18 2.3 5.2 43.0 25.0 60.0 0.44 47.4 43.9
Tanaja Kennedy - 18 21.5 4.4 1.6 3.9 1.6 0.0 2.7 4.3 4.6 33 16 2.1 3.9 39.0 29.4 62.5 -1.95 45.7 42.2
Macy Brackett - 22 13.6 4.2 3.2 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.0 3.5 5.0 13 15 0.9 2.6 50.0 100.0 56.0 -2.42 52.2 50.6
Daiysha Brown - 19 15.2 3.9 2.4 2.3 1.3 0.3 1.3 3.5 5.4 58 17 3.4 9.3 37.9 31.6 60.0 1.69 46.7 42.4
Amira Roy - 21 9.0 3.3 2.6 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.7 2.9 3.0 -9 15 -0.6 -3.4 52.5 0 71.4 -3.58 53.8 52.5
Jamicia Davis - 24 10.4 3.2 2.0 1.3 0.6 0.0 1.3 2.4 3.4 25 17 1.5 6.1 34.5 38.5 68.8 -1.15 49.3 38.8
Kyla Thomas - 20 8.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 0.4 0.2 1.1 2.6 2.4 -10 16 -0.6 -3.2 42.3 50.0 60.0 -3.43 46.1 44.2
Auak Jok - 11 5.4 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.1 1 7 0.1 1.3 33.3 0.0 100.0 -1.32 43.6 33.3

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG