Alabama A&M Bulldogs
2023 Team Stats (5 games)
48.6
PPG
56.2
Opp
-7.6
Margin
29.2%
FG%
21.6%
3P%
74.3%
FT%
40.0
RPG
11.0
APG
17.0
TO
81.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 996 (#212) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 964 (#278) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +15.2 (#215) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.645 (#135) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | vs | Murray State Racers | L | 36 - 57 |
| 2023-01-09 | @ | Jackson State Lady Tigers | L | 35 - 63 |
| 2023-01-16 | vs | Alabama State Lady Hornets | W | 60 - 46 |
| 2023-02-06 | vs | Grambling Lady Tigers | W | 57 - 53 |
| 2023-03-08 | vs | Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions | L | 55 - 62 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Free
|
F | 5 | 32.8 | 11.4 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 11.8 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 37.3 | 32.0 | 100.0 | - | 46.6 | 44.1 |
T. Grace
|
G | 5 | 24.4 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 8.8 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 29.5 | 23.5 | 87.0 | - | 46.2 | 34.1 |
A. Simmons
|
G | 5 | 20.0 | 7.8 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 9.4 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 27.7 | 41.7 | 72.7 | - | 37.6 | 33.0 |
J. Cody
|
C | 5 | 29.4 | 4.2 | 8.2 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 6.6 | 8.6 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 0.0 | 42.9 | - | 29.1 | 27.3 |
A. Nicholson
|
F | 1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 51.5 | 66.7 |
C. Mitchell
|
F | 4 | 9.8 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 71.4 | 0 | 80.0 | - | 76.1 | 71.4 |
E. McCallop
|
G | 5 | 18.4 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 12.5 | 100.0 | - | 44.0 | 34.4 |
T. Smith
|
G | 5 | 23.4 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 7.0 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 11.4 | 10.0 | 100.0 | - | 19.0 | 14.3 |
D. Burgin
|
G | 5 | 20.8 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 23.5 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 30.8 | 26.5 |
I. Elam
|
F | 4 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 45.0 | 50.0 |
J. Murray
|
G | 3 | 10.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 23.0 | 20.0 |
D. Frazier
|
C | 4 | 7.2 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 25.4 | 28.6 |
L. Shakespeare
|
C | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
S. Reed
|
G | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
M. Cable
|
G | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG