๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Air Force

Also known as: Air Force Falcons, Air Force
Program History

2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)

93.5
PPG
83.8
Opp
+9.8
Margin
40.9%
FG%
32.4%
3P%
72.7%
FT%
43.8
RPG
15.0
APG
10.8
TO
79.0
Est. poss./game
82.2
Adj PPG
83.6
Adj Opp PPG
#265
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 707 (returning production + recruiting): last season 789, returning +19, transfers -74, freshmen -27 More โ†’ 776 (#301) Preseason prior 707 (returning production + recruiting): last season 789, returning +19, transfers -74, freshmen -27
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +206 elo More โ†’ 880 (#306) HCA +206 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +205 elo More โ†’ 884 (#304) HCA +205 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.2 More โ†’ -5.6 (#221) HCA +2.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.2 More โ†’ -5.6 (#221) HCA +2.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.285 (#242) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -0.3 More โ†’ 0.385 (#226) AdjNet -0.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -0.0 More โ†’ 0.387 (#225) AdjNet -0.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 82.2 | AdjD 83.6 More โ†’ 0.376 (#265) AdjO 82.2 | AdjD 83.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 82.3 | AdjD 83.7 More โ†’ 0.379 (#259) AdjO 82.3 | AdjD 83.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.367 (#235) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.367 (#235) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 178 | GP 3 More โ†’ 885 (#270) RD 178 | GP 3
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.290 (#295) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 @ Wright State Raiders L 71 - 102
2026-11-05 vs Calumet St. Joseph Crimson Wave W 107 - 58
2026-11-08 vs Idaho State Bengals W 89 - 82
2026-11-11 vs Loyola Chicago Ramblers W 107 - 93
2026-11-14 @ Pacific Tigers - Postponed
2026-11-15 @ Pacific Tigers - Preview
2026-11-21 @ UTSA Roadrunners - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions and box-score rates; an unlisted position is inferred from those rates, and missing rates are treated as zero. Legend numbers are each player's share of recorded roster minutes, scaled to five players' regulation minutes; they can differ from minutes per game in the roster below, especially when players miss games or coverage is incomplete. Each position column totals one regulation game's minutes. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kam Sanders Kam Sanders G 4 28.2 20.2 4.8 4.5 1.5 0.5 1.5 14.2 15.8 -9 2 -4.5 -5.8 49.1 31.2 64.5 -0.21 57.3 53.5
Grant Best Grant Best G 4 30.5 18.5 4.8 3.2 4.8 0.2 1.8 12.0 17.8 -18 2 -9.0 -11.5 41.7 47.4 92.6 -0.04 61.8 51.0
Lucas Hobin Lucas Hobin F 4 24.8 16.0 4.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.8 10.2 10.0 7 2 3.5 6.2 39.0 42.3 80.8 -0.1 61.0 52.4
Caleb Walker Caleb Walker F 3 28.0 12.0 8.7 1.0 1.7 0.3 1.7 10.3 11.7 -14 2 -7.0 -9.6 35.5 0 56.0 -0.1 42.9 35.5
Ethan Greenberg Ethan Greenberg G 4 16.0 7.0 2.5 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.8 6.0 3.8 -11 2 -5.5 -11.0 45.8 27.8 33.3 -0.81 55.3 56.2
A.J. Patterson A.J. Patterson G 4 17.2 6.8 2.8 1.8 1.0 0.2 2.0 3.5 7.0 -19 2 -9.5 -19.8 42.9 50.0 80.0 -0.9 65.5 53.6
Diggy Griffin Diggy Griffin G 1 3.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 - - - - 100.0 0 50.0 - 86.8 100.0
Keaton Frisch Keaton Frisch F 1 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 - - - - 100.0 0 0.0 - 82.0 100.0
Justin Hinds Justin Hinds G 4 12.8 3.8 4.0 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 3.5 6.0 13 2 6.5 27.5 42.9 25.0 100.0 0.51 50.4 46.4
Brendan Martin Brendan Martin F 4 12.0 3.5 3.0 1.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 -18 2 -9.0 -45.1 23.5 9.1 83.3 -1.87 35.6 26.5
Eli Robinson Eli Robinson F 4 11.8 3.0 2.8 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.5 -5 2 -2.5 -8.1 41.7 0 50.0 -1.69 43.6 41.7
Mayson Thomas Mayson Thomas F 1 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 - - - - 50.0 0.0 100.0 - 61.5 50.0
Mark Caslaru Mark Caslaru C 1 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 - - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Tre Keene Tre Keene G 1 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 - - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Josh Gatete Josh Gatete F 4 13.0 1.2 2.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.2 2.2 -3 2 -1.5 -7.0 22.2 16.7 0 -0.6 27.8 27.8
Wesley Celichowski Wesley Celichowski C 2 9.0 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 -1 1 -1.0 -3.3 50.0 0 0 -1.03 50.0 50.0
Riley Dering Riley Dering F 1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 -2.0 -8 1 -8.0 -114.3 0.0 0.0 0 -1.68 0.0 0.0
Elliott Taite Elliott Taite G 1 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -1.0 - - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0
Caleb Fay Caleb Fay F 1 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 - - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0
Kolby Gilles Kolby Gilles F 2 3.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 -0.5 1 1 1.0 23.5 0.0 0.0 0 -0.85 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

Alumni in the Pros

Every program's alumni →

Former Air Force players in G League 2026-2027, matched by provider player ids (ESPN athlete ids, ESPN bios, linked StatsNBA/EuroLeague ids). Only games after their last Air Force game count. These are observed results, not certified complete seasons. League and team are where each player last played a regular-season or playoff game (NBA ahead of G League when he played in both); recent games include the preseason.

Active alumni

Player At School League Team GP MPG PPG RPG APG Last game Last 30 days
Ethan Taylor 2021-25 G League Birmingham Squadron 0 - - - - 11-08 3 pts, 0 reb, 0 ast Play-In 1 GP, 3.0 PPG, 0.0 RPG, 0.0 APG

Alumni around the leagues: recent games

Date Player League Team Opponent MIN PTS REB AST Box
2026-11-08 Ethan Taylor G League Play-In Birmingham Squadron @ Austin Spurs 5 3 0 0 Box

2026-2027 Shot Zones

286 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Sanders22% Sanders50% Sanders50% Sanders67% Best50% Best36% Greenberg29% Hobin38%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Walker24% Sanders28% Best67% Sanders67% Martin44% Hobin25% Hobin26% Sanders33% Best24%
Misses: who misses most here

Kam SandersGrant BestLucas HobinEthan GreenbergCaleb WalkerBrendan Martin

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 64-123 52.0 128 Kam Sanders 22% (28 pts) Caleb Walker 17% (22 pts) Caleb Walker 24% (14 misses) Grant Best 17% (10 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 10-39 25.6 20 Kam Sanders 50% (10 pts) Grant Best 20% (4 pts) Kam Sanders 28% (8 misses) Caleb Walker 21% (6 misses)
Mid-range left 4-7 57.1 8 Kam Sanders 50% (4 pts) Ethan Greenberg 25% (2 pts) Grant Best 67% (2 misses) Kam Sanders 33% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 0-0 - 0 - - - -
Mid-range right 3-6 50.0 6 Kam Sanders 67% (4 pts) Keaton Frisch 33% (2 pts) Kam Sanders 67% (2 misses) Lucas Hobin 33% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 0-9 0.0 0 - - Brendan Martin 44% (4 misses) Ethan Greenberg 33% (3 misses)
Right corner 3 2-18 11.1 6 Grant Best 50% (3 pts) Justin Hinds 50% (3 pts) Lucas Hobin 25% (4 misses) Brendan Martin 19% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 left 11-34 32.4 33 Grant Best 36% (12 pts) Lucas Hobin 36% (12 pts) Lucas Hobin 26% (6 misses) Ethan Greenberg 22% (5 misses)
Above-break 3 center 7-13 53.8 21 Ethan Greenberg 29% (6 pts) Grant Best 29% (6 pts) Kam Sanders 33% (2 misses) Brendan Martin 17% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 right 16-37 43.2 48 Lucas Hobin 38% (18 pts) Kam Sanders 19% (9 pts) Grant Best 24% (5 misses) Lucas Hobin 19% (4 misses)