Model Predictions
| Model | Tulane Green Wave | Memphis Tigers | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo | 34.9% (#296) | 65.1% (#269) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 52.2% (#235) | 47.8% (#271) | - |
| Margin | 54.7% (#174) | 45.3% (#209) | Tulane ... -1.0 |
| Pythagorean | 55.1% (#208) | 44.9% (#247) | - |
| Efficiency | 65.1% (#196) | 34.9% (#242) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 66.1% (#165) | 33.9% (#204) | - |
| Log Adjusted | 66.4% (#164) | 33.6% (#202) | - |
| Points Off/Def | 52.0% (#162) | 48.0% (#207) | - |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Tulane Green Wave | Memphis Tigers |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 28 | 25 |
| PPG | 64.4 | 65.4 |
| FG% | 39.5% | 39.3% |
| 3PT% | 27.1% | 23.7% |
| FT% | 69.7% | 60.7% |
| RPG | 38.6 | 38.0 |
| APG | 13.8 | 12.4 |
| SPG | 7.3 | 11.1 |
| BPG | 3.7 | 4.4 |
| TOPG | 17.8 | 16.6 |
Efficiency Ratings
| Metric | Tulane Green Wave | Memphis Tigers |
|---|---|---|
| Adj. Off Eff | 100.2 | 97.5 |
| Adj. Def Eff | 99.8 | 102.5 |
| Adj. Net Eff | 0.4 | -5.0 |
Efficiency = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent strength
Tulane Green Wave Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Mabry | 9.6 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 29.4 |
| D. Hanna | 7.3 | 6.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 27.5 |
| K. Daniel | 11.8 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 26.7 |
| K. Sneed | 6.5 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 24.5 |
| M. Marshall | 11.0 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 24.5 |
Memphis Tigers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Richmond | 14.8 | 5.3 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 34.2 |
| C. Allen | 6.6 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 31.2 |
| T. Smith | 12.7 | 5.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 28.8 |
| J. Hunter | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 28.6 |
| C. Harris | 10.7 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 22.4 |