Model Predictions
| Model | Pennsylvania Quakers | Yale Bulldogs | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo | 15.9% (#181) | 84.1% (#55) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 22.3% (#205) | 77.7% (#94) | - |
| Margin | 13.7% (#192) | 86.3% (#99) | Yale Bulldogs -10.1 |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Pennsylvania Quakers | Yale Bulldogs |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 5 | 5 |
| PPG | 68.8 | 86.8 |
| FG% | 43.0% | 51.3% |
| 3PT% | 30.5% | 40.6% |
| FT% | 72.4% | 70.0% |
| RPG | 35.0 | 40.2 |
| APG | 14.6 | 19.2 |
| SPG | 5.6 | 6.0 |
| BPG | 3.0 | 4.8 |
| TOPG | 13.2 | 13.2 |
Efficiency Ratings
| Metric | Pennsylvania Quakers | Yale Bulldogs |
|---|---|---|
| Adj. Off Eff | - | 97.8 |
| Adj. Def Eff | - | 102.2 |
| Adj. Net Eff | - | -4.5 |
Efficiency = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent strength
Pennsylvania Quakers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Goodman | 14.0 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 38.8 |
| A. Brodeur | 18.3 | 10.2 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 36.2 |
| R. Betley | 13.8 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 35.8 |
| J. Dingle | 12.8 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 31.7 |
| M. Martz | 5.8 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 28.3 |
Yale Bulldogs Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Swain | 16.3 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 35.3 |
| J. Bruner | 11.7 | 8.7 | 5.7 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 35.1 |
| P. Atkinson | 16.5 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 34.7 |
| E. Monroe | 12.0 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 34.3 |
| J. Gabbidon | 6.2 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 27.3 |