Model Predictions
| Model | Princeton Tigers | Pennsylvania Quakers | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo | 41.9% (#176) | 58.1% (#179) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 59.2% (#81) | 40.8% (#142) | - |
| Margin | 58.6% (#117) | 41.4% (#181) | Princet... -1.9 |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Princeton Tigers | Pennsylvania Quakers |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2 | 5 |
| PPG | 74.5 | 67.8 |
| FG% | 50.0% | 44.8% |
| 3PT% | 45.3% | 35.5% |
| FT% | 73.5% | 62.2% |
| RPG | 34.5 | 35.4 |
| APG | 14.0 | 14.4 |
| SPG | 3.0 | 5.2 |
| BPG | 4.0 | 2.6 |
| TOPG | 15.0 | 11.6 |
Efficiency Ratings
| Metric | Princeton Tigers | Pennsylvania Quakers |
|---|---|---|
| Adj. Off Eff | 106.1 | - |
| Adj. Def Eff | 93.9 | - |
| Adj. Net Eff | 12.1 | - |
Efficiency = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent strength
Princeton Tigers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Cannady | 20.7 | 7.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 35.7 |
| A. Bell | 7.7 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 32.3 |
| M. Stephens | 6.7 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 31.0 |
| S. Much | 9.3 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 17.7 |
| A. Young | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 16.3 |
Pennsylvania Quakers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Betley | 10.6 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 32.0 |
| D. Foreman | 11.4 | 5.6 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 30.7 |
| A. Brodeur | 15.1 | 8.1 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 30.1 |
| A. Woods | 5.9 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 27.9 |
| M. Rothschild | 7.3 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 18.6 |