🐻⬇️🏀

Emma Cannon

Emma Cannon

Team: Phoenix Mercury
Position: F

WNBA NCAAW

Career Stats Across Linked Profiles

Season observations across linked profiles for Emma Cannon. Per-game averages from the source shown; select a season to view its profile.

ESPN season totals include all teams and completed recorded phases, including special games; these are not regular-season totals. Team splits are shown on the linked profile.

Season League Team Source GP MIN PTS REB AST
2026 WNBA Los Angeles Sparks ESPN 20 7.6 3.9 1.4 0.3
2025 WNBA Los Angeles Sparks ESPN 22 10.4 4.5 2.0 0.4
2024 WNBA Las Vegas Aces / Dallas Wings ESPN 7 3.7 1.1 0.9 0.6
2023 WNBA Indiana Fever ESPN - - - - -
2022 WNBA Phoenix Mercury / Indiana Fever ESPN 25 13.5 6.6 3.0 0.6
2021 WNBA Las Vegas Aces / Connecticut Sun / Indiana Fever ESPN 20 14.7 5.5 3.7 0.8
2020 WNBA Las Vegas Aces ESPN - - - - -
2019 WNBA Connecticut Sun ESPN 2 4.0 1.5 0.0 0.5
2018 WNBA Phoenix Mercury ESPN 2 14.5 5.0 2.5 1.0
2017 WNBA Phoenix Mercury ESPN 40 12.9 4.0 3.7 0.3
2009-2010 NCAAW UCF Knights ESPN 2 0.0 12.0 11.5 2.0
2008-2009 NCAAW UCF Knights ESPN 7 0.0 14.1 9.9 0.6
2007-2008 NCAAW UCF Knights ESPN 13 0.0 12.8 8.8 1.2

Season Averages — 2017

Observed regular-season final played games

GP MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TO FGA Numbers +/- PG +/- Tot +/- /40 FG% 3P% FT%
34 12.9 4.4 3.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.9 3.4 4.3 -2.2 -76 -6.9 49.1% 0.0% 58.7%

Plus/minus sample — 2017-2018: 38 games, 962.4 minutes, 1911.9 possessions. Other models may cover a different set of games.

Advanced Stats

Legacy model artifacts; separate from the counting cohort. Plus/minus scope: 38 games.

RAPM Rank Minutes Possessions Model PM Model PM/G Model PM/40
+1.32 17 962 1951 +102 +2.7 +4.2

RAPM = Regularized Adjusted Plus-Minus (points per 100 possessions above average)

Model Outputs

No verified model outputs are published for this player in WNBA yet.

Shot Chart — 2017

61/129 FG (47.3%), 122 points from the field · ESPN shot locations · compared with the 2017 league average

made missed
56%48/85 21%4/19 29%2/7 33%1/3 60%6/10 0%0/2 0%0/2 0%0/1
FG% by zone: above below league average (zones with 5+ attempts)
Zone FGM FGA FG% League FG%+/- % of FGA
Restricted area 48 85 56.5 66.1 -9.6 65.9
Paint (non-RA) 4 19 21.1 43.5 -22.4 14.7
Mid-range left 2 7 28.6 39.0 -10.4 5.4
Mid-range center 1 3 33.3 39.5 -6.2 2.3
Mid-range right 6 10 60.0 39.0 +21.0 7.8
Left corner 3 0 0 - 34.4 - 0.0
Right corner 3 0 0 - 38.3 - 0.0
Above-break 3 left 0 2 0.0 34.5 -34.5 1.6
Above-break 3 center 0 2 0.0 32.3 -32.3 1.6
Above-break 3 right 0 1 0.0 34.1 -34.1 0.8

Career Stats

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games. Other career leagues are available through the league links above.

Season League Team GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers FG% 3P% FT% TS% eFG%
2026 WNBA Los Angeles Sparks 18 7.6 3.9 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 - 2.3 - 48.8% 48.0% 76.0% 68.3 63.4
2025 WNBA Los Angeles Sparks 20 10.0 4.5 1.8 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.8 3.0 3.4 51.7% 41.2% 66.7% 65.0 63.3
2024 WNBA Las Vegas Aces 5 1.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.6 66.7% 0.0% - 66.7 66.7
2023 WNBA Indiana Fever 9 11.4 5.2 3.3 0.7 0.0 0.1 - 4.1 - 48.6% 30.8% 100.0% 58.6 54.1
2022 WNBA Indiana Fever 8 13.0 6.1 2.5 0.9 0.4 0.0 - 4.1 - 54.5% 40.0% 68.8% 61.2 57.6
2021 WNBA Indiana Fever 6 18.5 7.7 4.3 1.2 0.7 0.0 - 7.3 - 45.5% 42.9% 50.0% 49.3 48.9
2021 WNBA Connecticut Sun 5 11.5 4.2 3.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 - 3.4 - 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 58.7 58.8
2017 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 34 12.9 4.4 3.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.9 3.4 4.3 49.1% 0.0% 58.7% 52.6 49.1

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

Game Log

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games.

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score MIN FG 3PT FT REB AST STL BLK TO PTS Numbers RAPM GS
2017-09-03vsATLW84-70171-50-11-210300239.0-
2017-09-01vsCONW86-66131-20-01-23100134.0-
2017-08-27@SEAW75-71182-50-00-08101544.0-
2017-08-24vsLASL67-82134-60-03-450002118.0-
2017-08-22@MINL69-105160-20-01-24000112.0-
2017-08-20@CONL66-94162-40-04-65000188.0-
2017-08-18@WASW89-79132-30-00-05000343.0-
2017-08-12vsSEAL89-98214-80-01-39000199.0-
2017-08-10@DALW101-100378-140-01-2902221714.0-
2017-08-06@WASL80-85203-60-02-53001086.0-
2017-08-04@CONL92-93132-30-00-21000042.0-
2017-07-30vsSANW81-64101-10-07-81000198.0-
2017-07-28@CHIW86-8051-20-00-00000020.0-
2017-07-25@ATLL91-99204-40-00-04001188.0-
2017-07-19vsINDL77-8471-30-02-43000143.0-
2017-07-16@MINL66-81210-40-03-66100135.0-
2017-07-14vsMINL71-88150-10-01-23000013.0-
2017-07-12vsATLW89-8462-20-00-04000244.0-
2017-07-09vsNYLW81-6910-00-00-01000001.0-
2017-07-07@SANW92-7791-10-00-02000122.0-
2017-07-05vsWASW88-8030-10-00-01100001.0-
2017-06-30vsMINL83-9171-40-00-04100122.0-
2017-06-23@SEAW85-8250-10-00-0200020-1.0-
2017-06-18@LASL59-90120-10-00-02000100.0-
2017-06-16vsCHIW86-78174-60-01-23010196.0-
2017-06-10vsLASL87-89153-40-01-23000076.0-
2017-06-07@INDW98-9081-10-00-04000025.0-
2017-06-04@NYLL72-8870-30-01-2010001-1.0-
2017-06-01@CHIW99-91101-30-00-01010120.0-
2017-05-27vsDALW107-65164-60-04-4810001215.0-
2017-05-23vsNYLL67-69123-60-11-12010074.0-
2017-05-19@SANW78-7250-10-00-01000000.0-
2017-05-17vsINDW85-6280-00-02-45000027.0-
2017-05-14vsDALL58-6850-10-00-0000000-1.0-