🐻⬇️🏀

Tamicha Jackson

Tamicha Jackson

Team: Portland Fire

Season Averages — 2002

Observed regular-season final played games

GP MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TO FGA Numbers +/- PG +/- Tot +/- /40 FG% 3P% FT%
32 21.6 9.8 1.8 3.0 1.7 0.0 - 9.1 - -1.1 -35 -2.0 41.9% 31.6% 69.7%

Plus/minus sample — 2002-2003: 32 games, 730.7 minutes, 1147.2 possessions. Other models may cover a different set of games.

Advanced Stats

Legacy model artifacts; separate from the counting cohort. Plus/minus scope: 32 games.

RAPM Rank Minutes Possessions Model PM Model PM/G Model PM/40
+0.56 63 730 1486 +39 +1.2 +2.1

RAPM = Regularized Adjusted Plus-Minus (points per 100 possessions above average)

Model Outputs

No verified model outputs are published for this player in WNBA yet.

Career Stats

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games. Other career leagues are available through the league links above.

Season League Team GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers FG% 3P% FT% TS% eFG%
2006 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 3 17.9 8.0 1.3 2.3 2.0 0.3 1.3 9.3 3.3 35.7% 0.0% 66.7% 39.2 35.7
2005 WNBA Washington Mystics 8 8.2 1.1 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.5 3.2 0.0 15.4% 11.1% 0.0% 16.7 17.3
2004 WNBA Washington Mystics 25 16.3 5.4 1.5 1.8 0.8 0.0 1.1 5.4 3.0 42.2% 40.0% 68.8% 47.5 45.9
2003 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 34 28.1 8.8 2.4 4.3 1.5 0.1 2.2 10.6 4.3 34.3% 35.4% 81.0% 40.5 39.2
2002 WNBA Portland Fire 32 21.6 9.8 1.8 3.0 1.7 0.0 - 9.1 - 41.9% 31.6% 69.7% 49.1 46.0
2001 WNBA Portland Fire 32 15.5 4.1 1.4 1.6 0.9 0.0 - 5.3 - 32.5% 15.4% 69.6% 36.8 34.3
2000 WNBA Dallas Wings 17 15.6 6.8 1.5 2.1 1.3 0.0 - 6.2 - 38.7% 25.0% 74.3% 47.8 42.5

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

Game Log

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games.

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score MIN FG 3PT FT REB AST STL BLK TO PTS Numbers RAPM GS
2002-08-11vsPHOL70-73222-60-15-71230198.0-
2002-08-09@SEAL74-83207-160-42-305402167.0-
2002-08-06vsUTAL69-82224-110-21-24501395.0-
2002-08-04@ORLL61-63214-101-41-234200109.0-
2002-08-02@WASW67-65164-80-20-22220185.0-
2002-07-30@HOUL59-89246-181-50-023403131.0-
2002-07-27vsMIAW71-61166-92-30-0230001410.0-
2002-07-25@SACL80-81323-121-60-0212027-2.0-
2002-07-24@LASL69-73195-134-50-022201146.0-
2002-07-21@PHOW87-75207-121-24-6231001913.0-
2002-07-19vsHOUW70-60229-131-32-5322002115.0-
2002-07-17vsPHOW73-61143-41-10-00140474.0-
2002-07-12vsLASL76-82293-72-40-01320-8--
2002-07-10@MINW75-72246-81-11-20330-14--
2002-07-07vsSACW74-59163-50-12-22520-8--
2002-07-03@CHAW76-73142-52-20-01310-6--
2002-07-02@CLEW68-64254-100-21-11410-9--
2002-06-30@NYLW54-44164-100-01-12100-9--
2002-06-28vsWASW72-66153-50-02-20110-8--
2002-06-26vsORLW64-5791-40-10-00110-2--
2002-06-25@UTAL83-86171-60-20-04310-2--
2002-06-23vsHOUL58-71222-51-10-02220-5--
2002-06-20vsINDL72-81234-81-41-11210-10--
2002-06-18vsMINW59-51294-102-24-47720-14--
2002-06-15vsDETW67-60221-40-24-61310-6--
2002-06-13@MINL46-60243-122-31-22120-9--
2002-06-11@SEAW70-63303-121-22-22310-9--
2002-06-06vsSACW86-73315-130-35-53830-15--
2002-06-03@LASL72-89348-200-33-63320-19--
2002-06-02vsSEAL47-57221-70-52-23510-4--
2002-05-30@UTAL64-69121-20-00-00300-2--
2002-05-29vsNYLL62-84143-60-02-31120-8--