🐻⬇️🏀

Anna DeForge

Anna DeForge

Team: Minnesota Lynx
Position: F

Season Averages — 2008

Observed regular-season final played games

GP MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TO FGA Numbers +/- PG +/- Tot +/- /40 FG% 3P% FT%
34 24.9 8.5 3.0 1.7 0.8 0.1 0.9 8.0 5.3 -0.5 -16 -0.8 39.1% 36.4% 76.3%

Plus/minus sample — 2008-2009: 34 games, 1108.2 minutes, 2200.8 possessions. Other models may cover a different set of games.

Advanced Stats

Legacy model artifacts; separate from the counting cohort. Plus/minus scope: 34 games.

RAPM Rank Minutes Possessions Model PM Model PM/G Model PM/40
+0.57 61 1108 2229 +31 +0.9 +1.1

RAPM = Regularized Adjusted Plus-Minus (points per 100 possessions above average)

Model Outputs

No verified model outputs are published for this player in WNBA yet.

Career Stats

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games. Other career leagues are available through the league links above.

Season League Team GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers FG% 3P% FT% TS% eFG%
2009 WNBA Dallas Wings 7 16.2 1.4 2.9 1.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 2.6 2.7 27.8% 0.0% - 27.8 27.8
2008 WNBA Minnesota Lynx 34 24.9 8.5 3.0 1.7 0.8 0.1 0.9 8.0 5.3 39.1% 36.4% 76.3% 50.0 47.8
2007 WNBA Indiana Fever 34 23.4 8.7 3.3 1.5 0.8 0.1 1.4 7.9 5.1 41.8% 41.0% 90.6% 52.5 49.8
2006 WNBA Indiana Fever 34 29.3 10.2 4.3 2.2 1.1 0.3 1.6 9.2 7.4 39.3% 37.8% 81.8% 50.9 47.0
2005 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 33 34.4 13.1 3.5 2.4 1.2 0.2 2.5 11.0 7.0 39.0% 32.6% 85.0% 51.9 45.5
2004 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 34 33.9 14.4 3.6 3.1 1.5 0.2 - 11.6 - 41.7% 38.7% 86.3% 55.3 50.5
2003 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 34 31.4 11.9 3.1 2.1 1.5 0.4 1.6 10.5 6.9 41.2% 41.2% 72.5% 52.3 49.7
2000 WNBA Dallas Wings 27 16.1 5.4 1.7 1.7 1.0 0.1 - 4.7 - 40.5% 32.1% 78.1% 51.8 47.6

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

Game Log

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games.

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score MIN FG 3PT FT REB AST STL BLK TO PTS Numbers RAPM GS
2008-09-14@WASW96-70256-94-70-0641011617.0-
2008-09-12vsPHOL87-96395-164-101-2533001510.0-
2008-09-09vsINDW86-76324-82-43-321101138.0-
2008-09-07@SACL71-78110-30-20-0100000-2.0-
2008-09-06@SEAL88-96257-103-40-0221021710.0-
2008-09-03@PHOL96-103288-195-132-221001236.0-
2008-09-01@LASL58-82152-40-10-02110044.0-
2008-08-30vsWASW92-78265-82-42-211000148.0-
2008-07-27vsLASL84-92272-91-50-03130152.0-
2008-07-25vsSANW78-68355-162-70-033200124.0-
2008-07-24@INDW84-80292-80-10-07220245.0-
2008-07-22vsSEAL73-76222-62-40-01500066.0-
2008-07-19@SANW87-74121-40-00-0100012-2.0-
2008-07-17@HOUL88-96140-20-10-0100010-2.0-
2008-07-12vsHOUW85-71276-165-100-0540111710.0-
2008-07-09vsATLL67-73212-62-30-04000064.0-
2008-07-05@SEAL71-96110-40-00-0000010-5.0-
2008-07-03@LASW88-70213-61-44-4221001110.0-
2008-07-01vsCHIL71-73171-40-11-22000031.0-
2008-06-28@SANL65-73293-110-50-09200066.0-
2008-06-26vsSACW80-76232-60-20-02300043.0-
2008-06-24vsNYLW91-69174-82-33-3241001312.0-
2008-06-21vsHOUL65-72182-61-30-2200025-1.0-
2008-06-20@DETL93-98210-10-00-34210303.0-
2008-06-14@NYLL76-77315-112-62-2603111412.0-
2008-06-12vsSACL78-82314-92-53-511112136.0-
2008-06-10vsCONL66-75282-70-30-0200014-2.0-
2008-06-08vsSANW90-78243-91-50-04300174.0-
2008-06-06@CONL77-78202-80-20-0010104-2.0-
2008-06-03@ATLW85-81291-40-34-42310266.0-
2008-05-31vsPHOW94-83313-52-30-064000813.0-
2008-05-29@CHIW75-69326-103-30-051002159.0-
2008-05-27@HOUW98-92397-141-34-4644141916.0-
2008-05-18vsDETW84-70231-40-20-02110121.0-