Tangela Smith
Team: Indiana Fever
Position: F
Season Averages — 2011
Observed regular-season final played games
| GP | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TO | FGA | Numbers | +/- PG | +/- Tot | +/- /40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | 21.5 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 7.2 | 4.5 | +1.7 | +57 | +3.2 | 37.1% | 34.0% | 88.2% |
Plus/minus sample — 2011-2012: 39 games, 1238.3 minutes, 2456.2 possessions. Other models may cover a different set of games.
Advanced Stats
Legacy model artifacts; separate from the counting cohort. Plus/minus scope: 39 games.
| RAPM | Rank | Minutes | Possessions | Model PM | Model PM/G | Model PM/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.79 | 37 | 1238 | 2484 | -37 | -0.9 | -1.2 |
RAPM = Regularized Adjusted Plus-Minus (points per 100 possessions above average)
Model Outputs
No verified model outputs are published for this player in WNBA yet.
Career Stats
STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games. Other career leagues are available through the league links above.
| Season | League | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | WNBA | Las Vegas Aces | 15 | 10.0 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 41.7% | 28.6% | 100.0% | 49.6 | 47.2 |
| 2011 | WNBA | Indiana Fever | 33 | 21.5 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 37.1% | 34.0% | 88.2% | 47.2 | 43.9 |
| 2010 | WNBA | Phoenix Mercury | 34 | 29.2 | 9.2 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 8.8 | 7.0 | 39.5% | 34.7% | 75.0% | 49.9 | 48.0 |
| 2009 | WNBA | Phoenix Mercury | 34 | 26.8 | 9.7 | 5.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 8.8 | 8.6 | 44.8% | 45.7% | 87.0% | 53.4 | 51.8 |
| 2008 | WNBA | Phoenix Mercury | 25 | 28.9 | 11.1 | 7.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 10.6 | 9.2 | 41.7% | 34.8% | 86.7% | 48.5 | 44.7 |
| 2007 | WNBA | Phoenix Mercury | 34 | 31.5 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 11.7 | 9.8 | 41.4% | 32.8% | 78.8% | 48.4 | 43.9 |
| 2006 | WNBA | Charlotte | 34 | 28.6 | 13.1 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 12.4 | 7.4 | 42.1% | 36.5% | 74.4% | 48.7 | 45.7 |
| 2005 | WNBA | Charlotte | 31 | 34.3 | 13.6 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 13.1 | 7.0 | 41.7% | 0.0% | 79.8% | 46.7 | 41.7 |
| 2004 | WNBA | Sacramento Monarchs | 34 | 26.8 | 11.2 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 11.8 | 5.2 | 41.1% | 17.2% | 80.4% | 44.6 | 41.8 |
| 2003 | WNBA | Sacramento Monarchs | 34 | 29.0 | 12.6 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 12.6 | 7.7 | 44.0% | 26.5% | 70.7% | 47.5 | 45.6 |
| 2002 | WNBA | Sacramento Monarchs | 32 | 33.2 | 14.7 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.4 | - | 13.6 | - | 42.3% | 35.7% | 85.1% | 48.9 | 44.0 |
| 2001 | WNBA | Sacramento Monarchs | 32 | 28.5 | 11.2 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.7 | - | 11.0 | - | 42.0% | 0.0% | 72.9% | 46.0 | 42.0 |
| 2000 | WNBA | Sacramento Monarchs | 32 | 28.9 | 12.1 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 2.0 | - | 11.6 | - | 47.4% | - | 78.3% | 49.6 | 47.4 |
| 1999 | WNBA | Sacramento Monarchs | 31 | 20.4 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 7.6 | 5.9 | 44.3% | 50.0% | 65.3% | 48.0 | 44.5 |
| 1998 | WNBA | Sacramento Monarchs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
Game Log
STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games.
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score | MIN | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PTS | Numbers | RAPM GS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-09-11 | vs | ATL | L | 88-93 | 18 | 6-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 11.0 | - |
| 2011-09-09 | @ | NYL | L | 75-83 | 19 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 1.0 | - |
| 2011-09-07 | vs | WAS | W | 87-69 | 31 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4.0 | - |
| 2011-09-04 | @ | CHI | W | 88-80 | 31 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10.0 | - |
| 2011-09-02 | @ | CON | L | 55-83 | 25 | 0-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -6.0 | - |
| 2011-08-30 | @ | ATL | L | 90-92 | 22 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 4.0 | - |
| 2011-08-27 | vs | ATL | L | 80-86 | 32 | 6-14 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 9.0 | - |
| 2011-08-21 | vs | WAS | W | 83-51 | 22 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 2.0 | - |
| 2011-08-18 | @ | LAS | L | 70-75 | 30 | 4-8 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 20.0 | - |
| 2011-08-16 | @ | SAN | W | 65-63 | 12 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5.0 | - |
| 2011-08-13 | vs | NYL | W | 82-71 | 23 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 8.0 | - |
| 2011-08-09 | vs | SAN | W | 81-68 | 15 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1.0 | - |
| 2011-08-07 | @ | CHI | L | 69-88 | 27 | 4-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 1.0 | - |
| 2011-08-05 | @ | TUL | W | 85-65 | 27 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | - |
| 2011-07-31 | vs | LAS | W | 98-63 | 21 | 7-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 11.0 | - |
| 2011-07-29 | @ | WAS | W | 61-59 | 16 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -1.0 | - |
| 2011-07-28 | @ | CON | W | 69-58 | 16 | 1-9 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -1.0 | - |
| 2011-07-21 | vs | CHI | W | 77-63 | 23 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6.0 | - |
| 2011-07-19 | @ | ATL | L | 74-84 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2.0 | - |
| 2011-07-17 | @ | CON | L | 71-76 | 17 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8.0 | - |
| 2011-07-15 | vs | MIN | L | 70-80 | 6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1.0 | - |
| 2011-07-13 | vs | CON | W | 90-78 | 25 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6.0 | - |
| 2011-07-05 | vs | SEA | W | 78-61 | 23 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6.0 | - |
| 2011-06-28 | vs | PHO | W | 91-86 | 15 | 1-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.0 | - |
| 2011-06-26 | @ | MIN | W | 78-75 | 14 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5.0 | - |
| 2011-06-25 | vs | CON | W | 75-70 | 26 | 1-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | -2.0 | - |
| 2011-06-21 | @ | WAS | W | 89-80 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | - |
| 2011-06-19 | @ | PHO | L | 89-93 | 25 | 2-10 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4.0 | - |
| 2011-06-17 | @ | SEA | L | 54-68 | 22 | 1-9 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -1.0 | - |
| 2011-06-14 | vs | TUL | W | 82-74 | 28 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7.0 | - |
| 2011-06-11 | @ | NYL | W | 86-80 | 18 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 5-5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10.0 | - |
| 2011-06-10 | vs | NYL | L | 80-81 | 28 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 10.0 | - |
| 2011-06-04 | vs | CHI | W | 65-57 | 31 | 6-13 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 7.0 | - |