🐻⬇️🏀

Marlies Askamp

Marlies Askamp

Team: Miami Sol
Position: C

Season Averages — 2000

Observed regular-season final played games

GP MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TO FGA Numbers +/- PG +/- Tot +/- /40 FG% 3P% FT%
32 27.2 7.8 7.2 0.9 0.5 0.7 - 6.5 - -0.8 -26 -1.2 40.7% 50.0% 68.4%

Plus/minus sample — 2000: 32 games, 635.9 minutes, 822.5 possessions. Other models may cover a different set of games.

Advanced Stats

Model outputs use a separate game sample from the counting statistics. Plus/minus scope: 32 games.

RAPM Rank Minutes Possessions Model PM Model PM/G Model PM/40
+0.19 109 635 1291 +73 +2.3 +4.6

RAPM = Regularized Adjusted Plus-Minus. Current fits use points per 40 minutes above average; historical artifact units are unverified.

Model Outputs — 2000

No verified model outputs are published for this player in WNBA for 2000.

Career Stats

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games. Other career leagues are available through the league links above.

Season League Team GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers FG% 3P% FT% TS% eFG%
2002 WNBA Los Angeles Sparks 20 10.7 3.0 2.5 0.2 0.6 0.2 - 2.8 - 47.3% 0.0% 64.3% 49.9 47.3
2002 WNBA Miami Sol 6 12.0 1.8 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.2 - 1.7 - 40.0% - 27.3% 37.1 40.0
2001 WNBA Miami Sol 30 14.5 2.5 2.9 0.5 0.4 0.4 - 1.9 - 48.3% - 56.2% 51.3 48.3
2000 WNBA Miami Sol 32 27.2 7.8 7.2 0.9 0.5 0.7 - 6.5 - 40.7% 50.0% 68.4% 48.2 40.9
1999 WNBA Phoenix Mercury - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1998 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 26 12.2 5.3 3.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.8 4.0 5.0 47.1% - 66.1% 52.9 47.1
1997 WNBA Phoenix Mercury 28 18.6 7.5 5.1 0.8 0.8 0.3 1.6 6.4 6.6 39.3% 0.0% 76.3% 48.2 39.3

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

Game Log

STATSNBA · WNBA · regular-season appearances. Coverage reflects stored source games.

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score MIN FG 3PT FT REB AST STL BLK TO PTS Numbers RAPM GS
2000-08-09vsORLW68-64426-110-08-1015011-20--
2000-08-06vsNYLW57-41323-100-02-510102-8--
2000-08-04vsCHAW60-50190-50-01-25001-1--
2000-08-02@SACL55-73101-20-00-01000-2--
2000-08-01@PORL50-54321-30-01-210002-3--
2000-07-30@SEAW64-51258-110-00-06210-16--
2000-07-28@MINL44-68213-60-00-27011-6--
2000-07-26@DETL62-78231-40-01-210402-3--
2000-07-22@CLEL47-76191-50-05-64112-7--
2000-07-21vsUTAW76-65285-71-16-86111-17--
2000-07-19vsPORW69-62190-50-00-04001-0--
2000-07-14@DETL50-80223-50-01-27001-7--
2000-07-13vsWASL48-60291-80-03-68220-5--
2000-07-10vsSEAW59-42324-60-013-1813010-21--
2000-07-08@NYLL51-63334-90-00-08300-8--
2000-07-07vsCLEW49-46304-80-01-18000-9--
2000-07-05@CHAL70-76315-90-02-2631001213.0-
2000-07-01@INDW54-52242-50-00-09100-4--
2000-06-30vsORLL63-66281-70-06-88100-8--
2000-06-28@ORLL53-61170-10-00-03100-0--
2000-06-24vsPHOL44-67233-40-01-23100-7--
2000-06-23vsLASL54-68210-40-02-22020-2--
2000-06-21@WASW57-55353-100-01-25102-7--
2000-06-18@NYLL52-58355-100-04-710100-14--
2000-06-17vsCLEW55-48324-100-12-240012103.0-
2000-06-15@HOUL53-77241-20-04-651011610.0-
2000-06-13vsDETW74-61371-40-05-6131101717.0-
2000-06-10vsMINL55-66190-40-01-210100-1--
2000-06-08vsWASL51-73282-60-00-08110-4--
2000-06-05@INDL59-80201-40-02-24010243.0-
2000-06-03@CHAW74-63347-130-05-8902121916.0-
2000-06-01vsINDL54-57335-110-03-41021211316.0-